Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3

Comparison 1. Crown versus filling.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Major failure 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Short term (less than 12 months) 1 76 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Long term (12 months to 48 months) 3 346 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.18 [0.06, 0.56]
2 Pain 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Short term (less than 12 months) 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Long term (12 months to 24 months) 2 312 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.15 [0.04, 0.67]
3 Discomfort associated with the procedure 2 381 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.36, 0.87]
4 Gingival bleeding 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Short term (less than 12 months) 2 226 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.69 [0.61, 4.66]
4.2 Long term (12 months) 2 195 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.74 [0.99, 3.06]