Niederle 2012.
| Methods | Allocation generation: computer generated Allocation concealment: central Blinding: no Number of dropouts: 4 not eligible/96 Median follow‐up: 36 months | |
| Participants | 92 randomised adult patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia requiring treatment after 1 previous systemic regimen
Type of lymphoma: CLL/SLL
Stage: Binet B/C Previous treatment: 1 line (refractory or relapse) Mean age: 68 years WHO Performance status: < 3 |
|
| Interventions | Investigational: bendamustine 100 mg/m2 iv, day 1 + 2, q4w Comparator: fludarabine 25 mg/m2 iv, days 1 to 5, q4w |
|
| Outcomes | (Non‐inferior) progression‐free survival Overall survival |
|
| Notes | Unpublished data provided by the investigators as individual patient data | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation lists, created by a block randomisation method with variable block size |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 4 randomised patients were ineligible and were not included in the analysis |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Analyses were done as stated in protocol |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Responsible party and sponsor: WiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding, open label |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |