Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;2020:5036260. doi: 10.1155/2020/5036260

Table 5.

Generated themes and myths generated from the focus group discussion.

Themes and subthemes generated from focus group discussion Number, n, and percentage (%) of respondents
Male Female respondents
Yes No Undecided Yes No Undecided
Theme 1: community perception of women undergoing caesarean section
Subtheme: doctors' monetary benefit 25 (65.8) 5 (13.2) 8 (21.1) 12 (50) 8 (33.3) 4 (16.7)
Subtheme: dangerous procedure 30 (78.9) 5 (13.2) 3 (7.9) 20 (83.3) 2 (8.3) 2 (8.3)
Subtheme: laziness 29 (76.3) 7 (18.4) 2 (5.3) 10 (41.7) 11 (45.8) 3 (12.5)

Theme 2: perceived indications and risk factors for caesarean section delivery
Subtheme: previous scars (from previous caesarean section and vaginal delivery) 20 (52.6) 10 (26.3) 8 (21.1) 17 (70.8) 2 (8.3) 5 (20.8)
Subtheme: medical deformities 16 (42.1) 4 (10.5) 18 (47.4) 20 (83.3) 4 (16.7) 0 (0)
Subtheme: maternal age 18 (47.4) 15 (39.5) 5 (13.2) 19 (79.2) 3 (12.5) 2 (8.3)

Theme 3: perceived advantages of caesarean section delivery
Subtheme: lifesaving 15 (39.5) 16 (42.1) 7 (18.4) 20 (83.3) 2 (8.3) 2 (8.3)
Subtheme: prevents mother-to-child transmission of HIV 21 (55.3) 5 (13.2) 12 (31.6) 17 (70.8) 5 (20.8) 2 (8.3)

Theme 4: perceived disadvantages of caesarean section delivery
Subtheme: expensive procedure 34 (89.5) 4 (10.5) 0 (0) 20 (83.3) 4 (16.7) 0 (0)
Subtheme: family breakups 20 (52.6) 15 (39.5) 3 (7.9) 6 (25) 17 (70.8) 1 (4.2)