. 2020 Jul 28;3(7):e209411. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9411

Table 1. Classification Contingency Table of Whether Performance Was Met^a .

Performance parameter	Performance met according to MRA
Performance parameter	Aspirin, No. yes/no	BP, No. yes/no	Smoking, No. yes/no
Performance met according to EHR^b
Yes	283/2	93/2	84/3
No	6/89	9/22	15/13
Observed median performance score, % (95% BCI)^c
MRA	76.0 (71.5-80.1)	80.6 (73.2-86.9)	85.7 (78.6-91.2)
EHR	74.9 (70.4-79.1)	75.1 (67.2-82.1)	75.4 (67.0-82.6)

Abbreviations: BCI, bayesian credible interval; BP, blood pressure; EHR, electronic health record; MRA, medical record abstraction.

^{^a}

Data were according to observed MRA and EHR.

^{^b}

Expressed as the number of patients for each performance met/not met.

^{^c}

The observed performance scores were obtained from the posterior distribution resulting from the combination of the likelihood obtained from either the MRA or EHR data with a diffuse prior.

Table 1. Classification Contingency Table of Whether Performance Was Meta .

Table 1. Classification Contingency Table of Whether Performance Was Met^a .