Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 14;22(7):e17491. doi: 10.2196/17491

Table 4.

Fidelity to the criterion and content validity according to the level of training.

Variable Resident (n=8) Practicing surgeon (n=21) Othera (n=1) P value

Median IQR Median IQR Median IQR
Fidelity to the criterionb

Ease of use 5 4.5-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .88

Navigation menu 5 5-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .62

Relevance as a learning tool 5 4-5 5 5-5 5 5-5 .73

Fulcrum effect 3.5 3-4 5 4-5 4 4-4 .13

Representation of the physical forceps in the virtual environment 4 3-5 4 4-5 5 5-5 .56

Simulation of the movements in MISc 4 4-4 4 4 - 5 5 5-5 .18

Innovation 5 4.5-5 5 5-5 5 5-5 .90

Graphic design 4.5 4-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .69

Feedback 5 4-5 5 5-5 5 5-5 .79

Relevance of the feedback 4 4-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .43
Content validityd

Hand-eye coordination 4.5 4-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .66

Depth perception 4 3.5-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .41

Basic psychomotor skills learning 4.5 4-5 5 5-5 5 5-5 .42

Basic steps of MIS 4 4-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .64

Metrics 4 3-5 4 4-5 5 5-5 .43

Ubiquitous learning 4 4-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .31
Taskse

Task 1 3.5 3-4 4 4-5 5 5-5 .19

Task 2 4 4-4.5 4 3-5 5 5-5 .41

Task 3 4 3.5-4 4 3-5 5 5-5 .40

Task 4 4 3-5 5 4-5 2 2-2 .21

Task 5 4.5 4-5 5 4-5 5 5-5 .65

Task 6 4 4-4 5 4-5 5 5-5 .02

aOther: An engineer highly experienced in the design of instruments and devices for minimally invasive surgery simulation.

bFor fidelity to the criterion questions, see Multimedia Appendix 1.

cMIS: minimally invasive surgery.

dFor content validity questions, see Multimedia Appendix 1.

eFor task descriptions, see Table 1.