Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD004487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004487.pub2

Moller 2000.

Methods Randomised, parallel group, double blind study
Participants 242 participants randomised to 4 groups, no withdrawals
 Number randomised to Intervention A: male 27, female 33, mean age 24.5
 Number randomised to Intervention B: male 26, female 34, mean age 26.2
 Number randomised to Placebo A: male 21, female 41, mean age 25.0 
 Number randomised to Placebo B: male 24, female 36, mean age 24.6
 Number of third molars removed per patient, in both groups: 1
 Mean baseline intensity Intervention A: categorical 2.00 (moderate 60) VAS 49.4
 Mean baseline intensity Intervention B: categorical 2.00 (moderate 60) VAS 47.3
 Mean baseline intensity Placebo A: categorical 2.00 (moderate 61, severe 1) VAS: 50.5 
 Mean baseline intensity Placebo B: categorical 2.00 (moderate 61) VAS: 47.6
 Setting: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Dental College, Aarhus (Denmark)
Interventions Intervention A: Paracetamol 1000 mg versus Placebo A
 Formulation: effervescent tablets
 Intervention B: Paracetamol 1000 mg versus Placebo B
 Formulation: tablets
 Anaesthesia: not stated
Outcomes PI at 4 hours: categorical scale 0‐3 (none ‐ severe) VAS scale 0‐100 mm (no pain ‐ worst possible pain)
 PR at 4 hours: categorical 0‐4 (none ‐ complete)
 Global assessment: categorical 0‐3 (poor ‐ excellent)
 Adverse effects reported as total number of adverse events, and number of patients with adverse events
Notes Sponsored by
 Bristol Myers Squibb
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear