Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;4(3):txaa108. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa108

Table 3.

Body weight and ultrasound measurements of cows fed high and low intakes with two levels of monensin inclusion

Lowa High Probabilityb
Item 0 200 0 200 SEM Monensin Intake
Number of observations 9 10 10 10
Initial measurements
 Body weight, kg 430.6 419.4 422.4 433.3 9.79 0.99 0.77
 Hip fat, mm 2.46 2.79 2.09 1.83 0.427 0.93 0.11
 Back fat, mm 2.57 2.34 1.75 1.68 0.357 0.66 0.04
 Ribeye area, cm2 58.19 56.13 56.27 58.97 2.286 0.89 0.84
Final measurements
 Body weight, kg 426.2 413.3 445.0 451.1 10.48 0.74 <0.01
 Hip fat, mm 2.24 2.69 2.91 2.74 0.489 0.76 0.45
 Back fat, mm 2.67 2.26 2.23 2.39 0.461 0.78 0.73
 Ribeye area, cm2 63.10 56.63 63.71 62.06 2.388 0.08 0.18
Change in measurements
 Body weight, kg −3.9 −5.4 20.1 15.9 3.21 0.36 <0.01
 Hip fat, mm −0.23 −0.10 0.82 0.91 0.406 0.77 0.01
 Back fat, mm 0.10 −0.08 0.48 0.71 0.350 0.94 0.09
 Ribeye area, cm2 4.90 0.29 6.94 3.10 1.950 0.03 0.19

aLow = received 80% NRC requirements; high = received 120% NRC requirements; 0 = 0 mg/d monensin inclusion; 200 = 200 mg/d monensin inclusion.

bMonensin = effect of 0 vs. 200; intake = effect of low vs. high; no treatment interactions (P > 0.24).