Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2020 Jun 18;127(1):143–154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316341

Table 3.

Summary of randomized trials of atrial fibrillation screening

Author/study Year Country Setting Screened age (years) N Modality/approach Screening period New atrial fibrillation detection rate
Morgan and Mant.22 2002 United Kingdom Primary care All Systematic (N=1,499) Pulse assessment and lead II rhythm strip 6 months 0.8%
Opportunistic (N=1,502) Clinical pulse assessment with discretionary 12-lead ECG if abnormal 6 months 0.5%
Fitzmaurice et al. (SAFE)49 2007 United Kingdom Primary care ≥ 65 Systematic (N=4,933) Pulse assessment and 12-lead ECG One-time 1.62%
Opportunistic (N=4,933) Pulse assessment and 12-lead ECG if abnormal One-time 1.64%
No screening (N=4,936) - - 1.04%
Halcox et al. (REHEARSE-AF)59 2017 United Kingdom Primary care or research visits > 65 Screening (N=501) Single-lead handheld ECG twice weekly 12 months 3.7%
No screening (N=500) - - 1.0%
Steinhubl et al. (mSToPS)48 2018 United States Health plan enrollees ≥ 75, ≥ 55 (male with 1 AF/stroke risk factor), ≥ 65 (female with 1 AF/stroke risk factor) Immediate screening (N=1,366) Single-lead patch monitor for up to 14 days (screened period) 4 months 3.9%
Delayed screening (N=1,293) Single-lead patch monitor for up to 14 days (unscreened period) 4 months 0.9%