Micari 2005.
Methods | Date of publication: 2005 Design: not reported Allocation: randomised Country: USA | |
Participants | Diagnosis: acute STEMI for PPCI Number: 30 (adenosine 14; control 16) Age, years: adenosine (mean 57), control (mean 57) Sex: 67% men Inclusion: symptoms consistent with myocardial ischaemia for 30 minutes and 2‐mm ST‐segment elevation in 2 contiguous electrocardiographic leads; STEMI presenting within 6 hours from the onset of AMI Exclusion: history of AMI; wall motion abnormalities in 1 vascular territory; cardiomyopathy Withdrawals or losses to follow‐up: not reported |
|
Interventions | Adenosine
Control
|
|
Outcomes |
Follow‐up: 4 weeks |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Patients with ST‐elevation AMI referred for percutaneous coronary stenting were randomized to receive intravenous adenosine"; no further description |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The thrombolysis In myocardial infarction flow grade after PCI was assessed by a reader blinded to the clinical and echocardiographic data" "Analysis of the myocardial contrast echocardiographic data was performed blinded to the clinical and angiographic data" "The analysis of wall motion index was performed blinded to all other data" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data were reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes stated in Methods are reported in Results |
Other bias | Low risk | Not obvious |