Kilic 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Single centre, parallel group RCT No. of women randomised: 40 No. of women analysed: 40 Power calculation for sample size: 9 per group for 80% power to detect a 20% decrease in the PBAC score with SD 14 ITT analysis Funding: not stated |
|
Participants | Country: Turkey Women taking anticoagulant therapy after cardiac valve replacement, with median age 36 years. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: not reported |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Primary
Secondary
|
|
Notes | HMB is a potential side effect of treatment with anticoagulant therapy | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "simple randomisation method" but this method was not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "closed envelopes" ‒ insufficient information to know whether allocation was properly concealed |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding, lack of blinding likely to influence outcome |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Haematin alkaline, Haemoglobin All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding, lack of blinding unlikely to influence outcome |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding, lack of blinding likely to influence outcome |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) (Haematine alkaline and haemoglobin) All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding, lack of blinding unlikely to influence outcome |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "all participants completed the study" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Adverse events not assessed |
Other bias | Low risk | Groups appeared comparable at baseline ‒ no other potential bias |