Mathew 2018.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | "Randomised controlled pre‐test post‐test design" in India Trial dates: not mentioned |
|
Participants | 30 mothers and their infants. 60% of mothers were primiparous and 93% had normal vaginal delivery. Age of infants at start of study: 10 days to three months of life Inclusion criteria: lactating mothers 20 to 35 years old, 10 days up to 3 months of postpartum Exclusion criteria: none mentioned Breastfeeding method: direct breastfeeding during the intervention period. No mention if supplemental feeding was allowed. |
|
Interventions |
Arm 1: fennel tea (14 grams of in two liters of water) and 300 mL of this was given per day for seven consecutive days (n = 15) Arm 2: fenugreek tea (14 grams in two liters of water) and 300 mL of this was given each day for seven days (n = 15) |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Funding and Declaration of interest | Self‐funded. The authors declared no conflict of interest. | |
Notes | Further clarification about the study was needed but attempts to contact the authors failed. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Lottery method |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | How this was done was not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Fennel and fenugreek are aromatic herbs. Their smell and taste are distinct. Therefore it its likely that participants would be able to guess what they were drinking. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Milk volume outcomes | Low risk | Milk volume was assessed via test weighing, thus unlikely to be affected. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Self reported outcomes (adverse effects and measures of maternal psychological status) | Low risk | This was not an outcome in the study. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Infant weight outcomes | Low risk | This was not an outcome in the study. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants recruited were included in the analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The outcomes mentioned in the methods did not match results of study. Measures of dispersion was not included in the results. |
Other bias | Low risk | None detected |