Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 23;2:100013. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2019.100013

Table 3.

Associations of MSA/MAA with IIM at different antibody intensity levels.

Antibody IIM (n = 187)
non-IIM (n = 632)
Number
Neg
Number Weak posa Number
Posa
Number Neg Number Weak posa Number Posa OR pb OR wpb 95% CIc Pd
Jo-1 179 1 18 622 5 5 13.3 4.87–36.42 <0.001
0.7 0.08–6.38
EJ 176 0 2 629 1 2 3.4 0.47–24.30 0.372
OJ 185 1 0 630 1 1 0.567
3.4 0.21–54.41
PL-7 186 4 4 609 15 8 1.7 0.50–5.71 0.673
0.9 0.29–2.76
PL-12 179 3 1 623 6 3 1.1 0.11–10.97 0.748
1.7 0.42–6.87
SRP 181 2 9 617 14 1 31.56 3.97–250.73 <0.001
0.5 0.11–2.24
Mi-2α 174 2 6 630 2 0 <0.001
3.5 0.49–25.16
Mi-2β 177 2 4 620 9 3 4.6 1.01–20.59 0.089
0.86 0.16–3.55
MDA5 183 2 8 626 5 1 28.3 3.51–227.73 <0.001
1.4 0.27–7.35
NXP2 185 3 1 628 2 2 1.7 0.15–19.03 0.126
5.1 0.85–31.04
TIF1-γ 183 5 8 622 5 5 5.7 1.84–17.70 <0.001
3.6 1.02–12.48
SAE1 179 0 2 630 2 0 0.025
Ku 168 4 4 618 7 7 2.0 0.57–6.81 0.309
2.0 0.57–6.81
PM/Scl-75 174 4 9 603 23 6 5.2 1.82–14.80 0.002
0.6 0.20–1.77
PM/Scl-100 177 4 6 613 12 7 3.0 0.98–8.94 0.126
1.2 0.36–3.62
a

Data is not corrected for multiple antibodies in one patient.

b

OR; odds ratio at weak positive level (wp), odds ratio at positive level (p) calculated using logistic regression analysis.

c

95% confidence interval of odds ratio’s.

d

Logistic regression analysis of IIM vs non-IIM with positive, weak positive and negative antibody.