Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2020 May 30;20(2):1423–1430. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8821

Population pharmacokinetics model and initial dose optimization of tacrolimus in children and adolescents with lupus nephritis based on real-world data

Xiao Chen 1,*, Dong-Dong Wang 1,*, Hong Xu 2,, Zhi-Ping Li 1
PMCID: PMC7388563  PMID: 32765671

Abstract

The present study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetics model of tacrolimus and further optimize the initial dosing regimen of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Pediatric and adolescent patients with LN were recruited between August 2014 and September 2019 at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China). Relevant information was used to set up a population pharmacokinetics model with a Nonlinear Mixed Effect Model and the initial dosage regimen was simulated with the Monte Carlo method. Body weight and co-administration of wuzhi capsule were indicated to influence tacrolimus clearance in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN, and at the same body weight, the rate of tacrolimus clearance in patients without vs. with co-administration of wuzhi capsule was 1:0.71. In addition, in patients who were not administered wuzhi capsule, an initial dosage regimen of 0.15 mg/kg/day was recommended for a body weight of 10-23 kg and 0.10 mg/kg/day for 23-60 kg; in patients who were administered wuzhi capsule, an initial dosage regimen of 0.10 mg/kg/day was recommended for a body weight of 10-23 kg and 0.05 mg/kg/day for 23-60 kg. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to establish a population pharmacokinetics model of tacrolimus in order to determine the optimal initial dosage regimen of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN.

Keywords: population pharmacokinetics, initial dose optimization, tacrolimus, children and adolescents, lupus nephritis

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease (1) characterized by connective-tissue inflammation and extensive vasculitis (2-5). It primarily occurs in adolescents aged 10-19 years, although 1/3 of affected patients are <10 years old and the majority are females (1,6). Organ lesions in pediatric and adolescent patients with SLE are more severe than those in adults and may lead to death in a relatively short time, being associated with dismal prognoses (1). Pediatric and adolescent patients with SLE frequently have complex and severe clinical manifestations (1,6) that affect various different organs, either simultaneously or successively involving multiple systems, including the urinary, nervous, cardiovascular and blood supply systems (1).

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe complications of SLE and its incidence rate reaches up to 60% in patients with SLE worldwide. Among patients with SLE, 50-80% are cases of pediatric-onset SLE (7-10). As comprehensively reviewed (10), without pharmacotherapy, long-term LN may induce irreversible renal injury and subsequently develops into end-stage renal disease. Traditional treatments of LN involve a combination therapy of cyclophosphamide with glucocorticoids, which have been demonstrated to improve the long-term prognosis. However, its usage is limited by severe adverse effects, including hemorrhagic cystitis, amenorrhea, malignancy and sepsis. Novel immunosuppressants, including tacrolimus, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil are required to inhibit the side effects of traditional treatments. Tacrolimus has been reported to be a safe and effective agent for treating patients with LN (10).

However, considerable intra- and inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability makes it difficult to establish individualized tacrolimus dosage regimens. Of note, population pharmacokinetics is able to differentiate in terms of pharmacokinetic variability and has a higher statistical power to verify the effect of multiple factors on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of tacrolimus compared to traditional pharmacokinetic analysis and makes it possible to formulate an optimal dosage schedule (11,12). Hence, the present study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetics model of tacrolimus and further optimize the initial dosage regimen for tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN.

Patients and methods

Study design

The clinical information of pediatric and adolescent patients with LN treated between August 2014 and September 2019 at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) was retrospectively collected. The clinical information was collected from the hospital's information system and tacrolimus whole-blood levels were acquired from a therapeutic drug detection system. Partial basic clinical information data with partial overlap were collected from certain patients in previous studies (13,14). The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Children's Hospital of Fudan University [ethical approval code: (2019)020]. The present study was a retrospective study and was approved by the ethics committee of this hospital without the requirement for written informed consent. A previous study have used lower patient numbers (15).

Population pharmacokinetics modeling

The population pharmacokinetics model was established using Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modeling software (NONMEM®; version VII; ICON Development Solutions Ltd.) by the first-order conditional estimation method with interaction. The pharmacokinetics parameters included apparent oral clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F) and absorption rate constant (Ka), where the value of Ka was fixed at 4.48 per hour (13,16-18). Inter-individual variabilities were estimated by equation (i): A=T(A) x exp(ηi). A and T(A) represent the individual parameter value and the typical individual parameter value, respectively. ηi represented a symmetrical distribution (0, ω2), which was a random term with zero mean and variance ω squared (ω2).

Random residual variabilities were estimated by equation (ii): A=(1 + ε1) x B. A and B represent the observed concentration and the individual predicted concentration, respectively. ε1 represented a symmetrical distribution (0, σ2), which was a random term with zero mean and variance σ squared (σ2).

Covariate model

Weight and pharmacokinetics parameters were estimated by equation (iii): Ai=Astd x (WTi/WTstd)power. Ai and WTi represent the i-th individual pharmacokinetics parameter and the i-th individual body weight, respectively. Astd represents the typical individual parameter of WTstd (WTstd was the standard body weight, which was 70 kg). Power was the allometric coefficient, which was set at 0.75 for the CL/F and 1 for the V/F (19). Continuous covariates and categorical covariates were estimated by equation (iv) and (v), respectively: Ai=T(A) x (Covi/Covmedian)θ and Ai=T(A) x (1 + Covi x θ). Ai and T(A) represent the individual parameter value and the typical individual parameter value, respectively. θ represents the parameter to be estimated and Covmedian is the population median for the covariate. Covi represents the covariate of the i-th individual. When a covariate was finally incorporated into the model, the corresponding θ value was obtained. Changes in objective function values (OFV) were assessed by covariate inclusions and a decrease of OFV >3.84 (P<0.05). An increase in OFV >6.63 (P<0.01) was considered sufficient for significance in the final model.

Evaluation and simulation

The reliability and stability of the final parameters were assessed by bootstrap (n=1,000), which was performed using the NONMEM® software (version VII; ICON Development Solutions Ltd), goodness of fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive check (VPC) plots. The Monte Carlo method was used for the simulation of the optimal initial dose, including six weight groups (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 kg) and seven initial dosing regimens (0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 mg/kg daily) split into two doses. Based on previous publications, the therapeutic window of tacrolimus treatment in LN is between 5 and 15 ng/ml; thus, this was used in the present study (10).

Results

Data collection

The clinical information of 32 pediatric and adolescent patients with LN (5 males and 27 females) was collected for the present study and was used for population modelling. The clinical information of certain patients was collected in previous studies (13,14). Table I presents patient characteristics and drug combinations.

Table I.

Demographic data of patients (n=32) and drug combinations.

Characteristic N or mean ± SD Median (range)
Gender (male/female) 5/27  
Age (years) 13.44±2.86 13.87 (2.86-17.99)
Body weight (kg) 45.89±10.55 47.00 (17.00-66.50)
Albumin (g/l) 38.24±6.21 39.40 (10.00-49.30)
Alanine transaminase (IU/l) 13.88±15.69 10.00 (1.00-123.00)
Aspartate transaminase (IU/l) 16.37±8.10 15.00 (5.00-79.80)
Creatinine (µmol/l) 55.71±19.59 54.00 (16.00-225.00)
Urea (mmol/l) 6.14±2.61 5.80 (2.10-27.30)
Total protein (g/l) 64.26±7.13 65.20 (37.90-79.70)
Total bile acid (µmol/l) 4.78±6.34 3.70 (0.90-85.50)
Direct bilirubin (µmol/l) 1.68±3.56 1.40 (0.20-55.10)
Total bilibrubin (µmol/l) 6.34±4.12 6.00 (2.30-64.90)
Hematocrit (%) 36.57±4.85 36.50 (20.50-50.00)
Hemoglobin (g/l) 122.01±21.97 120.00 (70.20-290.00)
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg) 28.15±2.33 28.00 (21.00-35.00)
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (g/l) 330.25±13.93 333.00 (271.00-383.00)
Co-medication
     Glucocorticoid 32  
     Wuzhi capsule 12  

SD, standard deviation.

Population pharmacokinetic model

The final covariate model was described by equations (vi) and (vii), respectively: CL/F=θCL/F x (WT/70)0.75 x (1 + WZ x θWZ) and V/F=θV/F x (WT/70). θCL/F and θV/F are the typical population values of CL/F and V/F, respectively. θWZ is the coefficient of wuzhi capsule. When patients were co-administered wuzhi capsule and tacrolimus, WZ=1 was used; otherwise, WZ=0 was applied.

Validation

As presented in Fig. 1, observations vs. population predictions, observations vs. individual predictions, conditional weighted residuals (WRES) vs. population predictions and conditional WRES vs. time after the start of therapy were assessed in goodness of fit plots. The parameter estimates of the final model and bootstrap validation are presented in Table II. The prediction-corrected visual predictive check plots of the final model are provided in Fig. 2, where most of the observations are within the 95% prediction intervals of the simulation data, indicating that the prediction-corrected concentrations were well predicted by the final model.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The final model goodness-of-fit plots. (A) Observations vs. population predictions. (B) observations vs. individual predictions, (C) conditional WRES vs. population predictions and (D) conditional WRES vs. time after the start of therapy. WRES, weighted residuals. Partial concentration values were collected based on previous studies (13,14).

Table II.

Parameter estimates of the final model and bootstrap validation.

      Bootstrap  
Parameter Estimate SE Median 95% CI Bias
CL/F (l/h) 15.5 0.729 18.5 [2.5, 24.4] 0.194
V/F (l) 174 1.908 303 [8, 1200] 0.741
Ka (1/h) 4.48 (fixed) - - - -
θWZ -0.290 0.390 -0.297 [-0.440, -0.133] 0.024
ωCL/F 0.172 0.461 0.175 [0.073, 0.292] 0.017
σ1 0.281 0.049 0.277 [0.249, 0.305] -0.014

The 95% CI was displayed as the 2.5th, 97.5th percentile of bootstrap estimates. CL/F, apparent oral clearance; V/F, apparent volume of distribution; Ka, absorption rate constant; θWZ, coefficient of wuzhi capsule; ωCL/F, inter-individual variability of CL/F; σ1, residual variability, proportional error; SE, standard error; Bias, prediction error [Bias=(Median-Estimate)/Estimate].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The final model VPC plots. The y-axis represents the observed whole blood concentration of tacrolimus. The middle solid line represents the median of the prediction-corrected concentrations. The lower and upper dashed lines are the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the prediction-corrected concentrations, respectively. The blue points represents observed concentrations (measured concentrations). The pink zone represents the confidence interval of the middle solid line and the purple zones indicate the confidence interval of the lower and upper dashed lines. VPC, prediction-corrected visual predictive check. Partial concentration values were collected based on previous studies (13,14).

Simulation

Body weight and co-administration of wuzhi capsule affected tacrolimus clearance in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN, and for the same body weight, the rate of tacrolimus clearance in patients who were not administered wuzhi capsule vs. those who were administered wuzhi capsule was 1:0.71 (Fig. 3). Fig. 4 presents the probability of achieving the target concentrations under different initial doses. In addition, in patients who were not administered wuzhi capsule, the initial dosage regimen of 0.15 mg/kg/day was recommended for a body weight of 10-23 kg and 0.10 mg/kg/day for 23-60 kg; in patients who were co-administered wuzhi capsule and tacrolimus, the initial dosage regimen of 0.10 mg/kg/day was recommended for a body weight of 10-23 kg and 0.05 mg/kg/day for 23-60 kg, as presented in Table III.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CL/F of tacrolimus in children and adolescents with lupus nephritis. WZ, wuzhi capsule; CL/F, apparent oral clearance.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Probability to achieve the target concentrations (A) in patients without administration of wuzhi capsule and (B) in patients with administration of wuzhi capsule. WT, individual body weight.

Table III.

Initial dose recommendations of tacrolimus in children and adolescents with lupus nephritis.

Drug combination with wuzhi capsule Dose recommendation Body weight (kg) (mg/kg/day)a
No 10-23 0.15
No 23-60 0.10
Yes 10-23 0.10
Yes 23-60 0.05

aSplit into two doses.

Discussion

Tacrolimus, also known as FK506, is a 23-membered lactone ring that is isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis and used as a potent immunosuppressant. It has been reported that tacrolimus is 100 times stronger than cyclosporine and it may exert its effects by inhibiting the function of T lymphocytes and downregulating the expression of interleukin-2 (20,21). In addition, it has been used as the first-line drug for patients with liver and renal transplant (16,22-34). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that tacrolimus may be used to improve the outcome of patients who undergo bone marrow (35-42), lung (43) and heart transplantation (44).

In previous years, clinical experiments have also indicated that tacrolimus has useful applications in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (45-48), nephrotic syndrome (49-55), SLE (56-65), myasthenia gravis (66,67), ulcerative colitis (68,69) and autoimmune hepatitis (70). Furthermore, according to a previous review article, tacrolimus is a safe and effective agent for treating patients with LN (10).

It has been reported that the underlying mechanism of action of tacrolimus in LN is primarily its inhibitory effect on the dephosphorylation of the nuclear factor of activated T cells, which thereby reduces the activity of genes encoding interleukin-2 and associated cytokines (71), leading to the inhibition of T-cell activation. In addition, the effect of tacrolimus on LN is also the result of its well-known antiproteinuric effects that have been utilized in the treatment of a variety of kidney pathologies (72). It has also been reported that in mouse models of SLE, tacrolimus inhibits the progression of glomerular hypercellularity, crescent formation and proteinuria development, and suppresses the increase of anti-double-stranded DNA antibody serum levels in animal models of spontaneous LN (73). Therefore, from the above perspective, the mechanism of action of tacrolimus in treating LN is well explained.

However, due to the considerable pharmacokinetic variation among individuals (74,75), the optimal initial dose regimen of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN has remained to be determined. Population pharmacokinetic models may be useful in predicting individualized therapy by integrating different effects of variables on drug exposure (76), which may determine the initial dosage in different diseases. This includes dose simulation of oxcarbazepine in pediatric patients with epilepsy (77), dose optimization of vancomycin in neonates and young infants (78), dose optimization of azithromycin in pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia (79), dose optimization of cyclosporin in pediatric patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (80) and dose optimization of tacrolimus in patients with nephritic syndrome (81,82). Thus, the present study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus and further optimize the initial dosage regimen of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN.

In the present study, body weight and co-administration of wuzhi capsule were indicated to influence tacrolimus clearance in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN. A previous similar study demonstrated a non-linear association between drug clearance and body weight in patients (19). In the present study, the rate of tacrolimus clearance in patients who were not administered wuzhi capsule and those who were administered wuzhi capsule with the same body weight was 1:0.71. Wuzhi capsule is a Chinese patent medicine, which contains the primary active ingredients schisandrin, schisantherin A and schisandrol B (83). It has been demonstrated that wuzhi capsule increases the concentration of tacrolimus (84-86) via inhibition of the enzyme cytochrome P450, family 3 (CYP3A) in order to inhibit the metabolization of tacrolimus (86,87). This is able to reduce the dose of tacrolimus required and reduce medical costs, particularly in patients who require to take tacrolimus over a long period of time. In addition, the present study revealed a wide range of hemoglobin levels, which may be due to differences in various physiological or pathological states among the pediatric patients. The specific mechanisms remain to be further explored.

Next, Monte Carlo simulation was used to further predict the optimal dose. This indicated that in patients who weren't administered wuzhi capsule, the initial dosage regimen of 0.15 mg/kg/day was recommended for a body weight of 10-23 kg and 0.10 mg/kg/day for 23-60 kg; in patients who were co-administered wuzhi capsule, the initial dosage regimen of 0.10 mg/kg/day was recommended for a body weight of 10-23 kg and 0.05 mg/kg/day for 23-60 kg.

However, there are limitations to the present study. Polymorphisms of CYP3A5 may be associated with tacrolimus required dose; however, the present study was based on real-world data, in which pharmacogenetics were not considered in tacrolimus dosing and therefore, no routine clinical testing was performed with this regard. Therefore, it should be further investigated whether the inclusion of genotyping in this model is able to better explain the variability in the dosage of tacrolimus. In addition, future studies with more patients are required to verify the results of the present study.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to construct a population pharmacokinetics model of tacrolimus and optimize the initial dosage regimen for tacrolimus treatment in pediatric and adolescent patients with LN.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant no. 18DZ1910604/19DZ1910703) and the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (grant no. 19XD1400900).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

ZL and HX conceived and designed the study. XC and DW collected and analyzed the data. XC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and informed consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Children's Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China). The present study was a retrospective study and the analysis was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital without the requirement for written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Papadimitraki ED, Isenberg DA. Childhood- and adult-onset lupus: An update of similarities and differences. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2009;5:391–403. doi: 10.1586/eci.09.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Takeuchi T, Tsuzaka K, Abe T, Yoshimoto K, Shiraishi K, Kameda H, Amano K. T cell abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity. 2005;38:339–346. doi: 10.1080/08916930500123983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:929–939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gurevitz SL, Snyder JA, Wessel EK, Frey J, Williamson BA. Systemic lupus erythematosus: A review of the disease and treatment options. Consult Pharm. 2013;28:110–121. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2013.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D'Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2007;369:587–596. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang JL, Yeh KW, Yao TC, Huang YL, Chung HT, Ou LS, Lee WI, Chen LC. Pediatric lupus in Asia. Lupus. 2010;19:1414–1418. doi: 10.1177/0961203310374339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanaka H, Joh K, Imaizumi T. Treatment of pediatric-onset lupus nephritis: A proposal of optimal therapy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017;21:755–763. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1381-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takei S, Maeno N, Shigemori M, Imanaka H, Mori H, Nerome Y, Kanekura S, Takezaki T, Hokonohara M, Miyata K, Fujikawa S. Clinical features of Japanese children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results of 1980-1994 survey. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997;39:250–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1997.tb03594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z, Aringer M, Bajema I, Berden JH, Boletis J, Cervera R, Dörner T, Doria A, et al. Joint European league against rheumatism and European renal association-European dialysis and transplant association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1771–1782. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou T, Lin S, Yang S, Lin W. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in induction therapy of patients with lupus nephritis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:857–869. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S189156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vadcharavivad S, Praisuwan S, Techawathanawanna N, Treyaprasert W, Avihingsanon Y. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Thai kidney transplant patients: Comparison with similar data from other populations. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41:310–328. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang D, Chen X, Xu H, Li Z. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen optimization of tacrolimus in Chinese pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Xenobiotica. 2020;50:178–185. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1601791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang DD, Lu JM, Li Q, Li ZP. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus based on real-world study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018;43:476–483. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen X, Wang D, Xu H, Li Z. Initial dose optimization of tacrolimus for children with systemic lupus erythematosus based on the CYP3A5 polymorphism and coadministration with Wuzhi capsule. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020;45:309–317. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mizuno T, Fukuda T, Christians U, Perentesis JP, Fouladi M, Vinks AA. Population pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus and sirolimus in children with recurrent solid tumours: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:1097–1107. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang JW, Liao SS, Zhu LQ, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Sun XY, Rao W, Qu W, Li WZ, Sun LY. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus early after Chinese pediatric liver transplantation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;53:75–83. doi: 10.5414/CP202189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lindbom L, Pihlgren P, Jonsson EN. PsN-Toolkit-a collection of computer intensive statistical methods for non-linear mixed effect modeling using NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005;79:241–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jusko WJ, Piekoszewski W, Klintmalm GB, Shaefer MS, Hebert MF, Piergies AA, Lee CC, Schechter P, Mekki QA. Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;57:281–290. doi: 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90153-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anderson BJ, Holford NH. Mechanism-based concepts of size and maturity in pharmacokinetics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:303–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ho S, Clipstone N, Timmermann L, Northrop J, Graef I, Fiorentino D, Nourse J, Crabtree GR. The mechanism of action of cyclosporin A and FK506. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1996;80:S40–S45. doi: 10.1006/clin.1996.0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang DD, Chen X, Li ZP. Tacrolimus ameliorates proteinuria in Chinese pediatric lupus nephritis patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2019;12:10931–10937. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andreu F, Colom H, Grinyo JM, Torras J, Cruzado JM, Lloberas N. Development of a population PK model of tacrolimus for adaptive dosage control in stable kidney transplant patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:246–255. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benkali K, Rostaing L, Premaud A, Woillard JB, Saint-Marcoux F, Urien S, Kamar N, Marquet P, Rousseau A. Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus exposure in renal transplant recipients on a new once-daily formulation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:683–692. doi: 10.2165/11535950-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bergmann TK, Hennig S, Barraclough KA, Isbel NM, Staatz CE. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant patients: Impact of CYP3A5 genotype on starting dose. Ther Drug Monit. 2014;36:62–70. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31829f1ab8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Han N, Ha S, Yun HY, Kim MG, Min SI, Ha J, Lee JI, Oh JM, Kim IW. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic model of tacrolimus in the early period after kidney transplantation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;114:400–406. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao W, Elie V, Roussey G, Brochard K, Niaudet P, Leroy V, Loirat C, Cochat P, Cloarec S, André JL, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:609–618. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zuo XC, Ng CM, Barrett JS, Luo AJ, Zhang BK, Deng CH, Xi LY, Cheng K, Ming YZ, Yang GP, et al. Effects of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Chinese adult renal transplant recipients: A population pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2013;23:251–261. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835fcbb6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu YX, Su QH, Wu KH, Ren YP, Li L, Zhou TY, Lu W. A population pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in healthy Chinese volunteers and liver transplant patients. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36:281–288. doi: 10.1038/aps.2014.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Musuamba FT, Guy-Viterbo V, Reding R, Verbeeck RK, Wallemacq P. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus early after pediatric liver transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 2014;36:54–61. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31829dcbcd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wallin JE, Bergstrand M, Wilczek HE, Nydert PS, Karlsson MO, Staatz CE. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: Early posttransplantation clearance. Ther Drug Monit. 2011;33:663–672. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31823415cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang XQ, Wang ZW, Fan JW, Li YP, Jiao Z, Gao JW, Peng ZH, Liu GL. The impact of sulfonylureas on tacrolimus apparent clearance revealed by a population pharmacokinetics analysis in Chinese adult liver-transplant patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34:126–133. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31824a67eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhu L, Yang J, Zhang Y, Jing Y, Zhang Y, Li G. Effects of CYP3A5 genotypes, ABCB1 C3435T and G2677T/A polymorphism on pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Chinese adult liver transplant patients. Xenobiotica. 2015;45:840–846. doi: 10.3109/00498254.2015.1021733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang DD, Chen X, Fu M, Zheng QS, Xu H, Li ZP. Model extrapolation to a real-world dataset: Evaluation of tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics and drug interaction in pediatric liver transplantation patients. Xenobiotica. 2020;50:371–379. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1631505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang DD, Chen X, Li ZP. Wuzhi capsule and haemoglobin influence tacrolimus elimination in paediatric kidney transplantation patients in a population pharmacokinetics analysis: A retrospective study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44:611–617. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fay JW, Nash RA, Wingard JR, Przepiorka D, Collins RH, Anasetti C, Devine SM, Pineiro LA, Storb RF, Aro RM, et al. FK 506-based immunosuppression for prevention of graft versus host disease after unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1995;27(1374) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fay JW, Wingard JR, Antin JH, Collins RH, Piñeiro LA, Blazar BR, Saral R, Bierer BE, Przepiorka D, Fitzsimmons WE, et al. FK506 (Tacrolimus) monotherapy for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after histocompatible sibling allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1996;87:3514–3519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nash RA, Etzioni R, Storb R, Furlong T, Gooley T, Anasetti C, Appelbaum FR, Doney K, Martin P, Slattery J, et al. Tacrolimus (FK506) alone or in combination with methotrexate or methylprednisolone for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from HLA-matched siblings: A single-center study. Blood. 1995;85:3746–3753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nash RA, Piñeiro LA, Storb R, Deeg HJ, Fitzsimmons WE, Furlong T, Hansen JA, Gooley T, Maher RM, Martin P, et al. FK506 in combination with methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from matched unrelated donors. Blood. 1996;88:3634–3641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Przepiorka D, Ippoliti C, Khouri I, Woo M, Mehra R, Le Bherz D, Giralt S, Gajewski J, Fischer H, Fritsche H, et al. Tacrolimus and minidose methotrexate for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease after matched unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood. 1996;88:4383–4389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Uberti JP, Silver SM, Adams PT, Jacobson P, Scalzo A, Ratanatharathorn V. Tacrolimus and methotrexate for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;19:1233–1238. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nash RA, Antin JH, Karanes C, Fay JW, Avalos BR, Yeager AM, Przepiorka D, Davies S, Petersen FB, Bartels P, et al. Phase 3 study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus with methotrexate and cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from unrelated donors. Blood. 2000;96:2062–2068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang D, Chen X, Xu H, Li Z. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen optimisation of tacrolimus in Chinese pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Xenobiotica. 2020;50:178–185. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1601791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Monchaud C, de Winter BC, Knoop C, Estenne M, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Pison C, Stern M, Kessler R, Guillemain R, Marquet P, Rousseau A. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and design of a Bayesian estimator for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in lung transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:175–186. doi: 10.2165/11594760-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Han Y, Zhou H, Cai J, Huang J, Zhang J, Shi SJ, Liu YN, Zhang Y. Prediction of tacrolimus dosage in the early period after heart transplantation: A population pharmacokinetic approach. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20:21–35. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chandrasekhara PK, Jayachandran NV, Thomas J, Agrawal S, Narsimulu G. Successful treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis with a combination of topical tacrolimus and oral prednisolone. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28:489–490. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1066-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shimizu M, Ueno K, Ishikawa S, Tokuhisa Y, Inoue N, Yachie A. Treatment of refractory polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis with tacrolimus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:2120–2122. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tanaka H, Tsugawa K, Suzuki K, Oki ES, Nonaka K, Kimura S, Ito E. Treatment of difficult cases of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis with tacrolimus. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166:1053–1055. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0380-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang D, Chen X, Li Z. Treatment of patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis with tacrolimus. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:2305–2309. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Choudhry S, Bagga A, Hari P, Sharma S, Kalaivani M, Dinda A. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:760–769. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gulati A, Sinha A, Gupta A, Kanitkar M, Sreenivas V, Sharma J, Mantan M, Agarwal I, Dinda AK, Hari P, Bagga A. Treatment with tacrolimus and prednisolone is preferable to intravenous cyclophosphamide as the initial therapy for children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82:1130–1135. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gulati S, Prasad N, Sharma RK, Kumar A, Gupta A, Baburaj VP. Tacrolimus: A new therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:910–913. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Loeffler K, Gowrishankar M, Yiu V. Tacrolimus therapy in pediatric patients with treatment-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19:281–287. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1370-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Roberti I, Vyas S. Long-term outcome of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome treated with tacrolimus. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1117–1124. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1471-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yang EM, Lee ST, Choi HJ, Cho HY, Lee JH, Kang HG, Park YS, Cheong HI, Ha IS. Tacrolimus for children with refractory nephrotic syndrome: A one-year prospective, multicenter, and open-label study of Tacrobell(R), a generic formula. World J Pediatr. 2016;12:60–65. doi: 10.1007/s12519-015-0062-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang D, Lu J, Li Q, Li Z. Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric refractory nephrotic syndrome and a summary of other pediatric disease models. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:4023–4031. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Duddridge M, Powell RJ. Treatment of severe and difficult cases of systemic lupus erythematosus with tacrolimus. A report of three cases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:690–692. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.11.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Miyasaka N, Kawai S, Hashimoto H. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for lupus nephritis: A placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter study. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19:606–615. doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0218-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watanabe H, Yamanaka R, Sada KE, Zeggar S, Katsuyama E, Katsuyama T, Narazaki MT, Tatebe NT, Sugiyama K, Watanabe KS, et al. The efficacy of add-on tacrolimus for minor flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective study. Lupus. 2016;25:54–60. doi: 10.1177/0961203315600538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yoon KH. Efficacy and cytokine modulating effects of tacrolimus in systemic lupus erythematosus: A review. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010(686480) doi: 10.1155/2010/686480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Lai FM, Tam LS, Li EK, Chow KM, Gang W, Li PK. Tacrolimus for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with pure class V nephritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:1678–1681. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kusunoki Y, Tanaka N, Kaneko K, Yamamoto T, Endo H, Kawai S. Tacrolimus therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus without renal involvement: A preliminary retrospective study. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19:616–621. doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0220-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alsuwaida A. Successful management of systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis flare-up during pregnancy with tacrolimus. Mod Rheumatol. 2011;21:73–75. doi: 10.1007/s10165-010-0340-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li H, Zhang X, Chen J. Successful treatment of steroid-refractory systemic lupus erythematosus-associated protein-losing enteropathy using combination therapy with tacrolimus and steroid. Lupus. 2011;20:1109–1111. doi: 10.1177/0961203311406766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kaieda S, Kobayashi T, Moroki M, Honda S, Yuge K, Kawano H, Mitsuyama K, Sata M, Ida H, Hoshino T, Fukuda T. Successful treatment of rectal ulcers in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus using corticosteroids and tacrolimus. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24:357–360. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.852846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Politt D, Heintz B, Floege J, Mertens PR. Tacrolimus-(FK 506) based immunosuppression in severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Nephrol. 2004;62:49–53. doi: 10.5414/cnp62049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhang Z, Yang C, Zhang L, Yi Q, Hao Z. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2017;20:341–347. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_97_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wang L, Zhang S, Xi J, Li W, Zhou L, Lu J, Lu J, Zhang T, Zhao C. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2017;264:2191–2200. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8616-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Komaki Y, Komaki F, Ido A, Sakuraba A. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus therapy for active ulcerative colitis; A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:484–494. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Matsuoka K, Saito E, Fujii T, Takenaka K, Kimura M, Nagahori M, Ohtsuka K, Watanabe M. Tacrolimus for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Intest Res. 2015;13:219–226. doi: 10.5217/ir.2015.13.3.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hanouneh M, Ritchie MM, Ascha M, Ascha MS, Chedid A, Sanguankeo A, Zein NN, Hanouneh IA. A review of the utility of tacrolimus in the management of adults with autoimmune hepatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:76–80. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1551498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Scott LJ, McKeage K, Keam SJ, Plosker GL. Tacrolimus: A further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation. Drugs. 2003;63:1247–1297. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363120-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Naesens M, Kuypers DR, Sarwal M. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:481–508. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04800908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Entani C, Izumino K, Iida H, Fujita M, Asaka M, Takata M, Sasayama S. Effect of a novel immunosuppressant, FK506, on spontaneous lupus nephritis in MRL/MpJ-lpr/lpr mice. Nephron. 1993;64:471–475. doi: 10.1159/000187375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jusko WJ, Thomson AW, Fung J, McMaster P, Wong SH, Zylber-Katz E, Christians U, Winkler M, Fitzsimmons WE, Lieberman R, et al. Consensus document: Therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus (FK-506) Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17:606–614. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199512000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Venkataramanan R, Swaminathan A, Prasad T, Jain A, Zuckerman S, Warty V, McMichael J, Lever J, Burckart G, Starzl T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995;29:404–430. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199529060-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zheng QS, Li LJ. Pharmacometrics: A quantitative tool of pharmacological research. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33:1337–1338. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen CY, Zhou Y, Cui YM, Yang T, Zhao X, Wu Y. Population pharmacokinetics and dose simulation of oxcarbazepine in Chinese paediatric patients with epilepsy. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44:300–311. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen Y, Wu D, Dong M, Zhu Y, Lu J, Li X, Chen C, Li Z. Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin and AUC-guided dosing in Chinese neonates and young infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;74:921–930. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2454-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zheng Y, Liu SP, Xu BP, Shi ZR, Wang K, Yang JB, Huang X, Tang BH, Chen XK, Shi HY, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of azithromycin in children with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(e00686-18) doi: 10.1128/AAC.00686-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wang DD, Ye QF, Chen X, Xu H, Li ZP. Population pharmacokinetics and initial dosing regimen optimization of cyclosporin in pediatric hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis patients. Xenobiotica. 2020;50:435–441. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2019.1651419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lu T, Zhu X, Xu S, Zhao M, Huang X, Wang Z, Zhao L. Dosage optimization based on population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in chinese patients with nephrotic syndrome. Pharm Res. 2019;36(45) doi: 10.1007/s11095-019-2579-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wang X, Han Y, Chen C, Ma L, Xiao H, Zhou Y, Cui Y, Wang F, Su B, Yao Y, Ding J. Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with nephrotic syndrome. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;57:125–134. doi: 10.5414/CP203355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wei H, Tao X, Di P, Yang Y, Li J, Qian X, Feng J, Chen W. Effects of traditional chinese medicine Wuzhi capsule on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41:1398–1403. doi: 10.1124/dmd.112.050302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Xin HW, Li Q, Wu XC, He Y, Yu AR, Xiong L, Xiong Y. Effects of Schisandra sphenanthera extract on the blood concentration of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67:1309–1311. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Xin HW, Wu XC, Li Q, Yu AR, Zhu M, Shen Y, Su D, Xiong L. Effects of Schisandra sphenanthera extract on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64:469–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02922.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Qin XL, Bi HC, Wang CX, Li JL, Wang XD, Liu LS, Chen X, Huang M. Study of the effect of Wuzhi tablet (Schisandra sphenanthera extract) on tacrolimus tissue distribution in rat by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Biomed Chromatogr. 2010;24:399–405. doi: 10.1002/bmc.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Qin XL, Bi HC, Wang XD, Li JL, Wang Y, Xue XP, Chen X, Wang CX, Xu le J, Wang YT, Huang M. Mechanistic understanding of the different effects of Wuzhi Tablet (Schisandra sphenanthera extract) on the absorption and first-pass intestinal and hepatic metabolism of Tacrolimus (FK506) Int J Pharm. 2010;389:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES