Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2020 Jul 3;61(32):152196. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2020.152196

Table 1.

Comparison of catalyst efficiency and chemoselectivitya

graphic file with name nihms-1610118-t0002.jpg
Entry Cat. Solvent Temp. (°C) Conv. (%)b 2a (%)b 3a (%)b 4a (%)b
1 Ir1 MeOH 25 40 28 12 <1
2 Ir1 MeOH 37 >99 93 7 <1
3 Ir2 MeOH 37 >99 95 5 <1
4 Ir3 MeOH 37 96 92 4 <1
5 Ir4 MeOH 37 >99 98 2 <1
6 Ir5 MeOH 37 >99 95 5 <1
7 Ir6 MeOH 37 >99 90 10 <1
8 Ir7 MeOH 37 >99 93 7 <1
9 Ir8 MeOH 37 >99 96 4 <1
10 Ir9 MeOH 37 >99 96 4 <1
11 Ir10 MeOH 37 80 12 67 <1
12 Ir11 MeOH 37 71 11 59 <1
13 Ir12 MeOH 37 50 21 29 <1
14c Ir1 MeOH 37 >99 81 <1 18
15c Ir1 EtOH 37 >99 52 <1 48
16c Ir1 iPrOH 37 >99 62 <1 38
17c Ir1 THF 37 35 10 25 <1
18c Ir1 MeCN 37 >99 96 4 <1
19 none MeOH 37 <1 <1 <1 <1
a

Reagents and conditions: 1a (100 μmol), Ir1 (1.0 μmol), HCOONH4 (200 μmol), solvent (0.5 mL), 15 h.

b

Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.

c

10 equiv. of HCOONH4 was used.