Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;2020(7):CD013684. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013684
Level of evidence and criteria Resilience factors
Level 1: strong evidence (SRs and MAs)
  • Factor has been studied for its association with resilience (i.e. mental health or well‐being or psychological adaptation despite (acute or chronic) stressors, life events or traumas) in observational (cross‐sectional or longitudinal) studies in adults

  • There is evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) AND meta‐analyses (MAs)

Level 1a: there is evidence for this factor from several SRs AND several MAs (both across different populations)
Level 1b: there is evidence for this factor from several SRs AND a single MA (both across different populations)
Level 1c: there is evidence for this factor from several SRs (across different populations) AND a single MA (in the same population)
Level 2: moderate evidence (only SRs or single MA)
  • Factor has been studied for its association with resilience (i.e. mental health or well‐being or psychological adaptation despite (acute or chronic) stressors, life events or traumas) in observational (cross‐sectional or longitudinal) studies in adults

  • There is evidence from SR OR a single MA

Level 2a: there is evidence for this factor from several SRs (across different populations) OR there is no evidence from SRs, but from a MA (across different populations)
Level 2b: there is evidence for this factor from several SRs (in the same population)
Level 2c: there is evidence for this factor from a single SR (in the same population)
Level 3: weak evidence (no SR or MA)
  • Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal

  • Factor has not been studied sufficiently for its association with resilience (i.e. mental health or well‐being or psychological adaptation despite (acute or chronic) stressors, life events or traumas) in adults

  • Factor is only mentioned in unsystematic narrative reviews or discussion papers, or both

 
MA: Meta‐analysis; SR: Systematic review.