Duphar H10802786F/M 1989.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Allocation: randomised, but no further details Design: prospective, parallel‐group, multicentre (5 centres) |
|
| Participants |
Number: 54 randomised, 38 analysed Age: mean 45.8 Gender: 20 M, 34 F Setting: 5 centres in France Eligibility criteria: at least 2 attacks of vertigo of over 2 minutes in the past 3 months at least 2 weeks apart; vertigo with and without cochlear symptoms Exclusion criteria: other causes of vertigo, relevant medications Baseline characteristics: comparable for age, sex, duration of history and time since last attack |
|
| Interventions | Betahistine 16 mg 3 times a day versus placebo for 90 days Intervention group: n = 27 Comparator group: n = 27 Use of additional interventions: none |
|
| Outcomes | Primary outcome: severity on 6‐point ordinal scale (0 to 5) Secondary outcomes: frequency of attacks, severity of attacks, investigator global assessment | |
| Funding sources | Manufacturer unpublished data | |
| Declarations of interest | Manufacturer unpublished data | |
| Notes | Unpublished study ‐ manufacturer supplied data | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation in blocks of 4, but sequence generation method unclear |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind, but no further information |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind, but no further information |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants lost to follow‐up: 16. Analysis was "as treated". |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol not available for inspection |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | — |