Duphar H10803592F 1997.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Allocation: randomised in groups of 4 using tables before study started Design: prospective, parallel, multicentre |
|
Participants |
Number: 144 Age: 18 to 70 Gender: not specified but groups statistically equal Setting: French ENT specialist units Eligibility criteria: recurrent vertigo (at least 2 attacks, at least 1 in last month) including Ménière's disease and other Exclusion criteria: medical and psychiatric disorders (specified), vertigo due to other causes, contraindication to betahistine Baseline characteristics: Table 2 shows statistical assessment of similarity |
|
Interventions | Betahistine 24 mg twice a day versus placebo for 30 days Intervention group: n = 119 Comparator group: n = 116 Use of additional interventions: none |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: frequency, severity, duration of attacks Secondary outcomes: patient and investigator global assessment | |
Funding sources | Unpublished manufacturer study | |
Declarations of interest | Unpublished manufacturer study | |
Notes | Unpublished trial | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomised in groups of 4 before study started using tables |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sealed envelopes; opacity not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "neither patient nor investigator knew which treatment was being given" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | As above |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants lost to follow‐up: 36. Reasons given for 28 of these. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes clearly reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Previous trial with betahistine excluded |