Duphar H10803592F 1997.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Allocation: randomised in groups of 4 using tables before study started Design: prospective, parallel, multicentre |
|
| Participants |
Number: 144 Age: 18 to 70 Gender: not specified but groups statistically equal Setting: French ENT specialist units Eligibility criteria: recurrent vertigo (at least 2 attacks, at least 1 in last month) including Ménière's disease and other Exclusion criteria: medical and psychiatric disorders (specified), vertigo due to other causes, contraindication to betahistine Baseline characteristics: Table 2 shows statistical assessment of similarity |
|
| Interventions | Betahistine 24 mg twice a day versus placebo for 30 days Intervention group: n = 119 Comparator group: n = 116 Use of additional interventions: none |
|
| Outcomes | Primary outcome: frequency, severity, duration of attacks Secondary outcomes: patient and investigator global assessment | |
| Funding sources | Unpublished manufacturer study | |
| Declarations of interest | Unpublished manufacturer study | |
| Notes | Unpublished trial | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomised in groups of 4 before study started using tables |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sealed envelopes; opacity not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "neither patient nor investigator knew which treatment was being given" |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | As above |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants lost to follow‐up: 36. Reasons given for 28 of these. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes clearly reported |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Previous trial with betahistine excluded |