Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 21;2016(6):CD010696. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010696.pub2

Duphar H10803592F 1997.

Study characteristics
Methods Allocation: randomised in groups of 4 using tables before study started
Design: prospective, parallel, multicentre
Participants Number: 144
Age: 18 to 70
Gender: not specified but groups statistically equal
Setting: French ENT specialist units
Eligibility criteria: recurrent vertigo (at least 2 attacks, at least 1 in last month) including Ménière's disease and other
Exclusion criteria: medical and psychiatric disorders (specified), vertigo due to other causes, contraindication to betahistine
Baseline characteristics: Table 2 shows statistical assessment of similarity
Interventions Betahistine 24 mg twice a day versus placebo for 30 days
Intervention group:
n = 119
Comparator group:
n = 116
Use of additional interventions: none
Outcomes Primary outcome: frequency, severity, duration of attacks
Secondary outcomes: patient and investigator global assessment
Funding sources Unpublished manufacturer study
Declarations of interest Unpublished manufacturer study
Notes Unpublished trial
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised in groups of 4 before study started using tables
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Sealed envelopes; opacity not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "neither patient nor investigator knew which treatment was being given"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants lost to follow‐up: 36. Reasons given for 28 of these.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes clearly reported
Other bias Unclear risk Previous trial with betahistine excluded