Canty 1981.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Allocation: no information Design: cross‐over with data extractable before cross‐over occurred |
|
| Participants |
Number: 32 randomised Age: 26 to 62 Gender: 29 M and 13 F Setting: not specified Eligibility criteria: episodic vertigo of peripheral origin for at least a yearExclusion criteria: central vertigo, Ménière's, asthma, peptic ulcer Baseline characteristics: no details |
|
| Interventions | Betahistine 32 mg for 8 weeks versus placebo Intervention group: n = 15 Comparator group: n = 17 Use of additional interventions: none |
|
| Outcomes | Primary outcome: vertigo scores (4‐point ordinal scale) Secondary outcomes: caloric and oculomotor tests, adverse events | |
| Funding sources | Not given | |
| Declarations of interest | Not specified | |
| Notes | Some participants in both groups had no symptoms throughout the trial duration | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Randomised"; no further information |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | "Double‐blind", but no further information |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | "Double‐blind", but no further information |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Participants lost to follow‐up: 0 in first treatment phase (before cross‐over) |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Outcome measures unclear. Also using first arm of cross‐over only. Adverse events only reported if "considered to represent adverse reactions to the study drug" without explicit criteria |
| Other bias | High risk | Some patients asymptomatic throughout entire trial period |