Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 21;2016(6):CD010696. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010696.pub2

Duphar H10800580M 1984.

Study characteristics
Methods Allocation: randomised, but not specified further
Design: prospective, parallel‐group, single centre
Participants Number: 40 randomised
Age: 20 to 70
Gender: 17 F 22 M
Setting: ENT hospital department
Eligibility criteria: vertigo attacks with "central signs" on ENGExclusion criteria: some medications and neurological disorders
Baseline characteristics: good similarity between groups for severity, duration of disease, duration of attacks (Table 3.7.1)
Interventions 12 weeks betahistine 16 mg 3 times a day versus placebo
Intervention group:
n = 20
Comparator group:
n = 20
Use of additional interventions: none
Outcomes Primary outcome: intensity 5‐point ordinal scaleSecondary outcomes: patient and investigator global assessment
Funding sources Unpublished manufacturer data
Declarations of interest Unpublished manufacturer data
Notes Unpublished study
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation list drawn up before the start of the study outside treatment centre
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind. Coding envelopes all returned unopened. Opacity not stated.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, but no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Low attrition and relatively complete datasets
Participants lost to follow‐up: 4
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No data on neuro‐otological signs though these were diagnostic criteria and appear to have been assessed
Other bias Unclear risk