Duphar H10800580M 1984.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Allocation: randomised, but not specified further Design: prospective, parallel‐group, single centre |
|
| Participants |
Number: 40 randomised Age: 20 to 70 Gender: 17 F 22 M Setting: ENT hospital department Eligibility criteria: vertigo attacks with "central signs" on ENGExclusion criteria: some medications and neurological disorders Baseline characteristics: good similarity between groups for severity, duration of disease, duration of attacks (Table 3.7.1) |
|
| Interventions | 12 weeks betahistine 16 mg 3 times a day versus placebo Intervention group: n = 20 Comparator group: n = 20 Use of additional interventions: none |
|
| Outcomes | Primary outcome: intensity 5‐point ordinal scaleSecondary outcomes: patient and investigator global assessment | |
| Funding sources | Unpublished manufacturer data | |
| Declarations of interest | Unpublished manufacturer data | |
| Notes | Unpublished study | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation list drawn up before the start of the study outside treatment centre |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind. Coding envelopes all returned unopened. Opacity not stated. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind, but no further information |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Low attrition and relatively complete datasets Participants lost to follow‐up: 4 |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No data on neuro‐otological signs though these were diagnostic criteria and appear to have been assessed |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | — |