Duphar H10800580M 1984.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Allocation: randomised, but not specified further Design: prospective, parallel‐group, single centre |
|
Participants |
Number: 40 randomised Age: 20 to 70 Gender: 17 F 22 M Setting: ENT hospital department Eligibility criteria: vertigo attacks with "central signs" on ENGExclusion criteria: some medications and neurological disorders Baseline characteristics: good similarity between groups for severity, duration of disease, duration of attacks (Table 3.7.1) |
|
Interventions | 12 weeks betahistine 16 mg 3 times a day versus placebo Intervention group: n = 20 Comparator group: n = 20 Use of additional interventions: none |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: intensity 5‐point ordinal scaleSecondary outcomes: patient and investigator global assessment | |
Funding sources | Unpublished manufacturer data | |
Declarations of interest | Unpublished manufacturer data | |
Notes | Unpublished study | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation list drawn up before the start of the study outside treatment centre |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind. Coding envelopes all returned unopened. Opacity not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind, but no further information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Low attrition and relatively complete datasets Participants lost to follow‐up: 4 |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No data on neuro‐otological signs though these were diagnostic criteria and appear to have been assessed |
Other bias | Unclear risk | — |