Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;2020(5):CD011737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011737.pub2

Comparison 4. SFA reduction vs usual diet ‐ secondary outcomes including potential adverse effects.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
4.1 Cancer diagnoses 4 52294 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.83, 1.07]
4.2 Cancer deaths 5 52283 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.61, 1.64]
4.3 Weight, kg 6 43062 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.77 [‐3.54, ‐0.01]
4.4 BMI, kg/m2 6 43894 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.42 [‐0.72, ‐0.12]
4.5 Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg 5 3812 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.19 [‐1.36, 0.97]
4.6 Diastolic Blood Pressure, mmHg 5 3812 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.36 [‐1.03, 0.32]
4.7 Quality of Life 1 40130 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.04 [0.01, 0.07]