Moy 2001.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT Summary risk of bias: moderate to high |
|
Participants | Middle‐aged siblings of people with early CHD, with at least 1 CVD risk factor (USA)
CVD risk: moderate
Control: randomised 132, analysed 118
Intervention: randomised 135, analysed 117
Mean years in trial: 1.9
% male: control 49%, intervention 55%
Age: control mean 45.7 (SD 7), intervention 46.2 (SD 7) Ethnicity: African‐American 18% int, 25% control (remainder of group ethnicity not described, and outcomes not presented by ethnicity) Statins use allowed? Unclear (raised LDL cholesterol was a condition of entry, so use of statins probably minimal) % taking statins: Not reported |
|
Interventions | Reduced fat intake vs usual diet Control aim: usual care Intervention aim: total fat 40 g/d or less Control methods: usual physician care with risk factor management at 0, 1 and 2 years Intervention methods: Individualised counselling by trained nurse, appointments 6 ‐ 8 weekly for 2 years Intervention delivered individually, face‐to‐face by a trained nurse. Total fat intake, %E (at 2 years): int 34.1 (SD unclear), cont 38.0 (SD unclear) (mean difference ‐3.90, 95% CI ‐6.46 to ‐1.34 assuming SDs of 10) significant reduction Saturated fat intake, %E (at 2 years): int 11.5 (SD unclear), cont 14.4 (SD unclear) (mean difference ‐2.90, 95% CI ‐4.18 to ‐1.62 assuming SDs of 5) significant reduction PUFA intake: not reported PUFA n‐3 intake: not reported PUFA n‐6 intake: not reported MUFA intake: not reported CHO intake: not reported Protein intake: not reported Trans fat intake: not reported Replacement for saturated fat: unclear Style: diet advice Setting: community |
|
Outcomes | Stated trial outcomes: dietary intake
Data available on total mortality? yes, no deaths
Cardiovascular mortality? yes, no deaths
Events available for combined cardiovascular events: total MI, stroke, unstable angina, PVD and PTCA Secondary outcomes: cancer diagnoses (no events), cancer deaths (none), stroke, total and non‐fatal MI, CHD mortality (none), CHD events (MI or angina) Tertiary outcomes: BMI, HDL and LDL cholesterol, TG |
|
Notes | Study duration 2 years Study aim was to reduce total fat based on ATPII dietary guidelines, and preliminary work established that this intervention reduced saturated fat and dietary cholesterol, and saturated fat intake was significantly lower than in the control group SFA reduction aimed and achieved Total serum cholesterol not reported, but LDL was, difference between intervention and control, mmol/L: ‐0.29 (95% CI ‐0.54 to ‐0.04), statistically significant reduction Trial dates: Study recruitment 1991 to 1994 Funding: National Institute of Nursing Research, General Clinical Research Center of the National Institutes of Health Declarations of Interest of primary researchers: none stated, all authors worked for academic or health institutions |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomly assigned via computerised schema after all eligible siblings from a family had been screened |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation method not clearly described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants clear about their allocation |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) CVD outcomes | High risk | Trialists clear about allocation |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All‐cause mortality | Low risk | Blinding is not relevant in assessment of mortality. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear, deaths, cancer and CV events are dropouts, trialists were asked for data ‐ unclear if any data missing |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Not relevant for primary and secondary outcomes as all trialists asked for data |
Free of systematic difference in care? | High risk | Differences in frequency of follow‐up, but unclear what differences in care occurred between the physician and nurse‐led care. See control and intervention methods in Interventions section of the table of Characteristics of included studies |
Stated aim to reduce SFA | Low risk | Aim to reduce SFA stated |
Achieved SFA reduction | Low risk | SFA reduction achieved |
Achieved TC reduction | Low risk | Statistically significant LDL fall (though TC not reported) |
Other bias | Low risk | None noted |