Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Jul 29;99:75–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.056

Table 1.

Unadjusted and adjusted marginal relative hazards of in-hospital mortality

Unadjusted HR (95% CI) p-Value Adjusted*£ HR (95% CI) p-Value
All patients
Control# (n = 92) 1.00 1.00
Hydroxychloroquine (n = 197) 0.43 (0.28, 0.64) <0.001 0.66 (0.39, 1.11) 0.118
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin (n = 94) 0.36 (0.21, 0.60) <0.001 0.44 (0.24, 0.82) 0.009
&Baseline PO2/FiO2 0-300
Control# (n = 41) 1.00 1.00
Hydroxychloroquine (n = 83) 0.52 (0.31, 0.87) 0.71 (0.37, 1.35)
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin (n = 28) 0.46 (0.23, 0.93) 0.59 (0.26, 1.35)
p-Value for interaction
<0.001
&Baseline PO2/FiO2 300+
Control# (n = 33) 1.00 1.00
Hydroxychloroquine (n = 100) 0.39 (0.15, 0.97) 0.49 (0.15, 1.63)
Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin (n = 60) 0.56 (0.21, 1.52) 0.62 (0.19, 1.97)
*

Adjusted for age, gender, number of comorbidities, CVD (yes/no), duration of symptoms, date of admission, CRP and censoring using IPW.

£

The overall estimate was also adjusted for baseline COVID-19 disease severity.

#

Heparin, immuno-modulatory drugs, HIV antivirals, combinations of these or no drugs at all.

&

45 patients missing baseline PO2/FiO2 not included in the stratified analysis.