Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 21;2015(4):CD009524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009524.pub2

NCT00912288.

Methods Multi‐centre, double‐blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial
Participants ‐ aged 50 years or older
‐ diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease according to DSM‐IV‐TR and NINCDS‐ADRDA criteria
‐ MMSE between 5 and 14, inclusive
‐ have taken memantine for at least 6 months prior to enrolment
Interventions Participants were randomized to either:
‐ latrepirdine (10 mg PO TID for 1 week followed by 20 mg PO TID until endpoint)
‐ matched placebo
Duration: 26 weeks
Enrolment:
‐ 86 patients randomized (44 to latrepirdine, 42 to placebo)
‐ 5 patients completed (3 in latrepirdine, 2 in placebo)
Outcomes Primary
‐ SIB (cognition)
‐ ADCS‐ADL (daily function)
Secondary
‐ MMSE (cognition)
‐ NPI (behaviour)
‐ CIBIC‐Plus (global function)
‐ RUD‐lite
‐ EQ‐5D
‐ pharmacokinetics
‐ adverse events
Notes Funding: Medivation Inc. and Pfizer Inc.
‐ this study was terminated on 7 May 2010 by the investigators due to lack of efficacy in the completed CONNECTION study. The authors maintain that termination was not due to safety concerns
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "randomized"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk This information has not been made available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "double‐blind (subject, care‐giver, investigator)"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "double‐blind (subject, care‐giver, investigator)"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The reasons for withdrawal from the study were provided in the patient flow table and were balanced between groups. This information is available in ClinicalTrials.gov
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Data on primary and secondary outcome measures have not been made available (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Other bias Unclear risk As the study has not been published by the study investigators and the information available in ClinicalTrials.gov is limited, we were not able to evaluate other sources of bias