Battaglini 2008.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Study design: RCT Number randomized: 20, but the numbers assigned to the exercise and control groups not reported Study start and stop dates: not reported Length of intervention: 16 weeks Length of follow‐up: to end of the intervention |
|
| Participants | Type cancer: breast cancer Time since cancer diagnosis: not reported Time in active treatment: not reported Inclusion criteria:
Eligibility criteria related to interest or ability, or both, to exercise:
Exclusion criteria:
Gender: female Current age, mean (SD) years:
Age at cancer diagnosis: not reported Ethnicity/race: not reported Education level: not reported SES: not reported Employment status: not reported Comorbidities: not reported Past exercise history: not reported On hormone therapy: not reported |
|
| Interventions | The number of participants assigned to the exercise intervention: not reported. The exercise intervention included:
Type exercise (aerobic/anaerobic): aerobic and anaerobic Intensity of the experimental exercise intervention: 40% to 60% of predicted maximum exercise capacity Frequency: twice per week Duration of individual sessions: 60 minutes Duration of exercise program: 16 weeks Total number of exercise sessions: 32 sessions Format: group Facility: facility based Professionally led by an undergraduate or graduate cancer exercise specialist Adherence: not reported The number of participants assigned to the control intervention was not reported and the control intervention was not described Contamination of control group: not reported |
|
| Outcomes | Primary outcome:
Other outcomes included:
Outcomes were measured at baseline; postsurgery; at treatments 1, 2, and 3; and at end of study, but the number of participants at each time point by treatment group was not reported Subgroup analysis: none reported Adverse events: none reported |
|
| Notes | Country: US Funding: none reported |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The generation of the random sequence was not described |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Whether the treatment assignment was concealed from study personnel and participants was not described |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Owing to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to conceal allocation to the intervention from the participants |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Allocation to the intervention was not concealed from the study personnel |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | There was no description of missing outcome data or attrition from the trial |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Owing to a lack of sufficient description of the outcomes, it is unclear whether there is selective reporting of the outcomes |
| Other bias | Low risk | The trial appears to be free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias |