Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD008465. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008465.pub2

Battaglini 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Number randomized: 20, but the numbers assigned to the exercise and control groups not reported
Study start and stop dates: not reported
Length of intervention: 16 weeks
Length of follow‐up: to end of the intervention
Participants Type cancer: breast cancer
Time since cancer diagnosis: not reported
Time in active treatment: not reported
Inclusion criteria:
  • recently diagnosed women with breast cancer

  • designated to undergo any type of surgery and required to receive either chemotherapy or radiation

  • 35 to 70 years old during the course of the study


Eligibility criteria related to interest or ability, or both, to exercise:
  • cardiovascular disease; acute or chronic respiratory disease; acute or chronic bone, joint, or muscular abnormalities that could prevent engagement in regular exercise was exclusionary


Exclusion criteria:
  • none


Gender: female
Current age, mean (SD) years:
  • exercise group: 57.5 (23) years

  • control group: 56.6 (16) years


Age at cancer diagnosis: not reported
Ethnicity/race: not reported
Education level: not reported
SES: not reported
Employment status: not reported
Comorbidities: not reported
Past exercise history: not reported
On hormone therapy: not reported
Interventions The number of participants assigned to the exercise intervention: not reported. The exercise intervention included:
  • an individualized exercise program included cardiovascular, resistance, and flexibility training


Type exercise (aerobic/anaerobic): aerobic and anaerobic
Intensity of the experimental exercise intervention: 40% to 60% of predicted maximum exercise capacity
Frequency: twice per week
Duration of individual sessions: 60 minutes
Duration of exercise program: 16 weeks
Total number of exercise sessions: 32 sessions
Format: group
Facility: facility based
Professionally led by an undergraduate or graduate cancer exercise specialist
Adherence: not reported
The number of participants assigned to the control intervention was not reported and the control intervention was not described
Contamination of control group: not reported
Outcomes Primary outcome:
  • total caloric intake, assessed using 3‐day food diary


Other outcomes included:
  • fatigue, assessed using the Revised PFS

  • body composition analysis, assessed using skinfold measurement for the determination of percent body fat

  • fitness assessments included cardiovascular endurance and dynamic muscular endurance


Outcomes were measured at baseline; postsurgery; at treatments 1, 2, and 3; and at end of study, but the number of participants at each time point by treatment group was not reported
Subgroup analysis: none reported
Adverse events: none reported
Notes Country: US
Funding: none reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The generation of the random sequence was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Whether the treatment assignment was concealed from study personnel and participants was not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Owing to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to conceal allocation to the intervention from the participants
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Allocation to the intervention was not concealed from the study personnel
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk There was no description of missing outcome data or attrition from the trial
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Owing to a lack of sufficient description of the outcomes, it is unclear whether there is selective reporting of the outcomes
Other bias Low risk The trial appears to be free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias