DiSipio 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods	Study design: RCT Number randomized: 337; numbers assigned to the exercise or control group not reported Study start and stop dates: started 2006, but end date not reported Length of intervention: unclear Length of follow‐up: unclear
Participants	Type cancer: breast cancer Time since cancer diagnosis: not reported Time in active treatment: not reported Inclusion criteria: resident of Queensland diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer in 2006 or 2007 Eligibility criteria related to interest or ability, or both, to exercise: none reported Exclusion criteria: none reported Gender: female Current age: not reported Age at cancer diagnosis: not reported Ethnicity/race: not reported Education level: not reported SES: not reported Employment status: not reported Comorbidities: not reported Past exercise history: not reported On hormone therapy: not reported
Interventions	Neither the exercise nor control interventions were described, nor the number of participants assigned to either group
Outcomes	No primary outcome was identified. QoL outcomes included: Global HRQoL, assessed using FACT‐B Outcomes were measured at baseline, mid‐intervention (6 months), and 3 months postintervention (12 months) Subgroup analysis: none reported Adverse events: not reported
Notes	Country: Australia Funding: none reported Published conference abstract
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	The generation of the random sequence was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Whether the treatment assignment was concealed from study personnel and participants was not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	High risk	Owing to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to conceal allocation to the intervention from the participants
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	High risk	The outcome assessor was blinded to the study allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Insufficient details provided to determine whether there was any attrition
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	Insufficient details provided to assess whether there was selective outcome reporting
Other bias	Low risk	The trial appears to be free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias