Hwang 2008.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: RCT Number randomized: 40; 17 to the exercise group and 20 to the control group Study start and stop dates: not reported Length of intervention: 5 weeks Length of follow‐up: to end of the intervention |
|
Participants | Type cancer: breast cancer Time since cancer diagnosis: not reported Time in active treatment: women approached at first planned radiation therapy treatment visit Inclusion criteria:
Eligibility criteria related to interest or ability, or both, to exercise:
Exclusion criteria:
Gender: female Current age, mean (SD) years:
Age at cancer diagnosis: not reported Ethnicity/race: not reported Education level: not reported SES: not reported Employment status: not reported Comorbidities: not reported Past exercise history: not reported On hormone therapy: not reported |
|
Interventions | 17 participants assigned to the exercise intervention, including:
Type exercise (aerobic/anaerobic): aerobic and anaerobic Intensity of the experimental exercise intervention: target HR of 50% to 70% of the age‐adjusted HR maximum Frequency: 3 times per week Duration of individual sessions: 50 minutes Duration of exercise program: 5 weeks Total number of exercise sessions: 15 sessions Format: not reported Facility: not reported Professionally led: not reported Adherence: all 17 patients completed the program 23 participants assigned to control group, including:
Contamination of control group: not reported |
|
Outcomes | No primary outcome was identified. Outcomes included:
Outcomes were measured at baseline and 5 weeks:
Subgroup analysis: none Adverse events: "No significant exercise‐related adverse events such as lymphedema were reported" |
|
Notes | Country: Korea Funding: none reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Generation of allocation sequence was not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Whether the treatment assignment was concealed from study personnel and participants was not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Owing to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to conceal allocation to the intervention from the participants |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Study personnel and outcome assessors were not masked or blinded to the study interventions |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 3 in control group lost to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | There appears to be no selective reporting of outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | The trial appears to be free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias |