Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD008465. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008465.pub2

Hwang 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Number randomized: 40; 17 to the exercise group and 20 to the control group
Study start and stop dates: not reported
Length of intervention: 5 weeks
Length of follow‐up: to end of the intervention
Participants Type cancer: breast cancer
Time since cancer diagnosis: not reported
Time in active treatment: women approached at first planned radiation therapy treatment visit
Inclusion criteria:
  • outpatient waiting list for radiation therapy for breast cancer


Eligibility criteria related to interest or ability, or both, to exercise:
  • concurrent major health problems that could affect participation in an exercise program including uncontrolled hypertension, cardiovascular disease, acute or chronic respiratory disease, and cognitive dysfunction


Exclusion criteria:
  • none


Gender: female
Current age, mean (SD) years:
  • exercise group: 46.3 (9.5) years

  • control group: 46.3 (7.5) years


Age at cancer diagnosis: not reported
Ethnicity/race: not reported
Education level: not reported
SES: not reported
Employment status: not reported
Comorbidities: not reported
Past exercise history: not reported
On hormone therapy: not reported
Interventions 17 participants assigned to the exercise intervention, including:
  • supervised exercise program, including stretching exercises focused on the shoulders, aerobic exercise such as treadmill walking and bicycling, and strengthening exercise


Type exercise (aerobic/anaerobic): aerobic and anaerobic
Intensity of the experimental exercise intervention: target HR of 50% to 70% of the age‐adjusted HR maximum
Frequency: 3 times per week
Duration of individual sessions: 50 minutes
Duration of exercise program: 5 weeks
Total number of exercise sessions: 15 sessions
Format: not reported
Facility: not reported
Professionally led: not reported
Adherence: all 17 patients completed the program
23 participants assigned to control group, including:
  • demonstration of shoulder ROM exercises and encouragement to continue with normal activities


Contamination of control group: not reported
Outcomes No primary outcome was identified. Outcomes included:
  • global QoL, assessed using the WHO QOL‐BREF

  • fatigue, assessed using the BFI

  • ROM, assessed by a physical therapist

  • pain, assessed using a single‐item VAS


Outcomes were measured at baseline and 5 weeks:
  • exercise group: n = 17 at baseline, n = 5 weeks

  • control group: n = 20 at baseline, n = 5 weeks


Subgroup analysis: none
Adverse events: "No significant exercise‐related adverse events such as lymphedema were reported"
Notes Country: Korea
Funding: none reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Generation of allocation sequence was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Whether the treatment assignment was concealed from study personnel and participants was not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Owing to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to conceal allocation to the intervention from the participants
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Study personnel and outcome assessors were not masked or blinded to the study interventions
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk 3 in control group lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk There appears to be no selective reporting of outcomes
Other bias Low risk The trial appears to be free of other problems that could put it at a high risk of bias