Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD008012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008012.pub3

McFarlane 2001.

Methods RCT design: 2‐arm parallel‐group trial
Total N randomised: 38
Length of follow‐up: No follow‐up
Analysis: Per‐protocol (27 completers, 6 drop‐outs in the treatment group, 5 drop‐outs in the control group)
Participants Location: Canada
Number of study centres and setting: Patients admitted to 1 coronary care unit
CAD diagnosis: Acute myocardial infarction; assessment method and time to randomisation not specified
Depression diagnosis: Score > 15 on the Inventory to Diagnose Depression (IDD) questionnaire on two occasions (just before hospital discharge and two weeks later)
Other entry criteria: None stated
Exclusion criteria: Predischarge 24‐hour Holter recordings showing either atrial fibrillation or ventricular etopic beats greater than 100 per hour, congestive heart failure, any life‐threatening comorbid condition, inability to complete the questionnaire, and taking antidepressant medication
Treatment N: 12 (33% female, mean age: 56 (SD: 11))
Control N: 15 (47% female, mean age: 56 (SD: 12))
Comparability of groups: No significant baseline differences
Interventions Treatment: Sertraline (50 mg/d)
Control: Placebo
Duration of treatment: 22 weeks
Outcomes Review outcomes: IDD depression score
Other outcomes: Time dependent changes in both time and frequency domain parameters of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) (heart rate, SD of all 24‐hour N‐N intervals (SDNN), root mean square of the SD of successive N‐N intervals (rMSSD), LF/HF ratio, LF power nu)
Funding Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Canada
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: No details reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: 11 drop‐outs (3 had side‐effects, 7 non‐compliant, 1 with ectopy)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: No protocol or design paper available
Comment: Outcomes reported according to methods section
Other bias High risk Comment: Inconsistent description of results (p. 619 and p. 620)