Li 2016.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Randomization using sealed, opaque and numbered envelopes, with a randomization table | |
| Participants | 92 women with CSP | |
| Interventions | All participants underwent UACE (MTX 50 mg infused bilaterally into the gelatin sponge particles). Within 24–48 hours, suction curettage under hysteroscopy monitoring (31A,17B. 48 cases, age: > 35y, n = 29; < 35y, n = 19), or suction curettage under ultrasonography monitoring (28A,16B. 44 cases, age: > 35y, n = 31; < 35y, n = 13) (A: diameter of the gestational sac ≤ 3.0 cm; B: diameter of the gestational sac > 3.0cm) |
|
| Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "a sealed opaque envelope with a serial number on the surface and a random number inside." |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The random number had been packed in the serially numbered envelopes by hospital staff members who had no contact with patients, clinicians, and investigators." |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "Clinicians were not masked to group assignment, but participants and data analysts were." |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Clinicians were not masked to group assignment, but participants and data analysts were." |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias existed. |