Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD005395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005395.pub3

Thomsen 1998.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind (until surgery)
Participants Patients with Ménière's disease
Interventions Ventilation tubes versus endolymphatic sac shunting
Outcomes Vertigo 
 Hearing 
 Tinnitus/aural fullness
Notes 1‐year follow‐up
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The method of randomisation was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk The randomisation results were kept in sealed envelopes; these were opened just before start of the surgery
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Neither the patients, nor the surgeons, nor the investigators were blind to the intervention used
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk There were no losses to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk The investigators and patients were not blinded to the intervention used
Follow‐up High risk Follow‐up was 1 year
Certainty of diagnosis Low risk The AAO‐HNS criteria were used