Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;10(7):e036549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036549

Table 3.

Incidence of term preeclampsia (%) per category of adequate or non-adequate gestational weight gain (GWG; adequate GWG as reference)

Differences with adequate weight gain Non-overweight
<25 kg/m²
(%) n=35 402
OR
95% CI
P value Overweight
25–29.9 kg/m²
(%) n=12 369
OR
95% CI
P value
−10 kg and lower 20/4465 (0.4) 0.50
(0.3 to 0.82)
0.003 0/259
(0.0)
−3 to 9 kg 97/17 759 (0.5) 0.61
(0.45 to 0.86)
0.002 23/2807
(0.8)
1.4 0.12
Adequate GWG±2 kg 66/7456 (0.88) Reference 20/3471
(0.57)
Reference
+3 to 9 kg 70/5063 (1.4) 1.57
(1.1 to 2.2)
0.004 58/4604
(1.3)
2.2
(1.3 to 3.7)
<0.0001
10 kg+ 23/679 (3.4) 3.9
(2.4 to 6.3)
<0.0001 23/679
(3.4)
4.6
(2.6 to 8.2)
<0.0001
Differences with adequate weight gain Obese
30–34.9 kg/m²
(%)
n=6019
OR
95% CI
P value Severe obese
≥35 kg/m²
(%)
n=3913
OR
95% CI
P value
−10 kg and lower 0/65 (0.0) 0/13
(0.0)
−3 to 9 kg 4/545 (0.7) 1.04 0.47 1/94
(1.1)
1.2 0.43
Adequate GWG±2 kg 8/1134 (0.7) Reference 2/233
(0.86)
Reference
+3 to 9 kg 43/2799 (1.5) 2.2
(1.07 to 5)
0.02 24/1259
(1.9)
2.2 0.13
10 kg+ 39/1476 (2.6) 3.8
(1.8 to 8.8)
<0.0001 73/2314
(3.2)
3.76
(1.1 to 23)
0.02

All women 57 703. Observed incidence of late-onset preeclampsia (LOP): 1.04%: 603/57 703. LOP incidence in all adequate GWG 0.78% (96/12 294).