Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD006063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006063.pub2

Jung 2005.

Methods DURATION OF INTERVENTION: 
 6 months 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 
 6 months 
 RUN‐IN PERIOD: 
 none 
 LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: 
 English
Participants WHO PARTCIPATED: 
 Koreans with type 2 diabetes mellitus who showed poor glycaemic control with glimepiride 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 aged 20‐70 years; secondary treatment failure (HbA1c > 8% on glimepiride 4 mg/day or equivalent dose of other sulfonylureas) 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 no other severe illnesses including liver failure, renal failure, heart failure 
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: 
 not stated 
 CO‐MORBIDITIES: 
 retinopathy ‐ 
 I: 3/14, C: 3/13 
 proteinuria ‐ 
 I: 2/14, C: 3/13 
 coronary heart disease ‐ 
 I: 2/14, C: 2/13 
 CO‐MEDICATIONS 
 lipid‐lowering agents ‐ 
 I: 5/14, C: 3/13
Interventions NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES: 
 1 
 COUNTRY/ LOCATION: 
 Korea 
 SETTING: 
 diabetes clinic of the Seoul National University Hospital 
 INTERVENTION (DOSE/DAY): 
 rosiglitazone 4 mg/day + glimepiride 4 mg/day 
 CONTROL (DOSE/DAY): 
 metformin 1000 mg/day + glimepiride 4 mg/day 
 TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY: 
 glimepiride 4 mg/day or equivalent dose of other sulfonylureas 
 TITRATION PERIOD: 
 none
Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 
 not stated 
 (resistin) 
 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 
 (not stated) 
 adiponectin, FPG, lipids, HbA1c, plasma insulin, plasma C‐peptide
Notes AIM OF STUDY: 
 to see whether improving insulin resistance can modulate circulating resistin levels, the effects of two different insulin sensitizers, rosiglitazone and metformin, on plasma resistin concentrations in Korean participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus were investigated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear