Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006734. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006734.pub2

Coovadia 2007.

Methods Non‐randomized intervention cohort study
Participants HIV‐infected and uninfected pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in KwaZulu Natal were enrolled into a non‐randomized intervention cohort study if they were 16 years of age or older, planned to stay in the study area for at least 3 months after delivery, and provided written informed consent.  Uninfected women were included to establish the effect of HIV status on adherence to exclusive breastfeeding and other infant feeding practices. 
Interventions Exclusive breastfeeding (antenatal counseling regarding infant feeding options, home visits 3‐4 times during first 2 weeks of life, and every 2 weeks thereafter until the infant was 6 months old. 
Outcomes HIV status:
1276 infants with complete feeding data. 
14.1 (95%CI: 12.0‐16.4) of exclusively breastfed infants infected with HIV by age 6 weeks and 19.5% (17.0‐22.4) by 6 months;  the risk was significantly associated with maternal CD4 cell counts below 200 cells/mm3 (adjusted HR 3.79; 2.35‐6.12) and birth weight < 2500 grams (1.81; 1.07‐3.06).  Breast infants who also received solid food during their first six months of life were significantly more likely to acquire infection than were exclusively breastfed children (HR 10;87; 1.51‐78.00; p=0.018), as were infants who at 12 weeks received both breast milk and formula milk (1.82; 0.98‐3.36; p=0.057). 
Mortality:
Cumulative 3‐month mortality was15.1% (7.63‐28.73) in infants given replacement feeds vs. 6.1% (4.74‐7.92) among exclusively breastfed infants (HR 2.06; 1.00‐4.27, p=0.51).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? High risk Not a randomized controlled trial
Allocation concealment? High risk Not a randomized controlled trial
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk This study was not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk "Data for nevirapine uptake and ingestion were inconsistent and are not included in any analysis."
Free of selective reporting? Low risk No problems apparent
Free of other bias? Low risk No problems apparent