Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;19:151. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01409-x

Table 1.

Proteins with native signal peptides used in this study

Product Native organism Protein Signal peptide
Accession number Temperature optimuma (°C) SignalP-5.0 (probability) PrediSI (score) Cleavage sitec (amino acid)
α-Amylase Sec/SPI
 amyL B. licheniformis BL00499 90 0.9792 0.9872 28/29, 28
 amyE B. subtilis BSU03040 50 0.9718 0.6027 29, 33/34
 amyS G. stearothermophilus GT50_07800 65 0.9807 1.0000 34/35, 34
 amy B. methanolicus BMMGA3_04345 ND 0.9931 0.6850 23/24, 24
Protease
 apr B. licheniformis BLI_RS05490 50 0.9935 0.9128 29/30, 29
 aprE B. subtilis GP2222_11200 60b 0.9929 0.8976 29/30, 29
 apr G. stearothermophilus GT50_00190 NC 0.6871 0.6283 30/31, 30

Signal peptides were analyzed by SignalP-5.0 and PrediSI [69, 71]

ND not determined, NC not characterized. To the best of the authors’ knowledge

a Temperature optimum of proteins previously determined. See text for details and references

b Temperature optimum for homolog protease-gene in B. subtilis A26

c As predicted by SignalP-5.0 and PrediSI, respectively [69, 71]