Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 5;2013(9):CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub4
Study Reason for exclusion
Allie 2004 Non‐randomised retrospective method
Bethell 2003 Literature review, not a research study
Cannavo 1998 RCT: comparison of alginate with gauze dressings for healing of surgical wounds, not of debridement
Capasso 2003 Non‐experimental retrospective chart review
Cohn 2004 Comparison of hydrofibre to wet to dry dressings for healing rates of surgical wounds, not of debridement
De Feo 2001 Retrospective chart review of wound infections over 20 years
De Feo 2003 Retrospective non‐randomised study
Doughty 2005 Management of surgical wound dehiscence and not a research paper
Douville 2004 Retrospective review of managing sternal wound complications
Edwards 1967 Clean surgical wound healing by primary intention ‐ no debridement required
Foster 2000 Abscess wounds
Gliantsev 1996 In vitro study
Gottrup 2005 A review, not RCT
Granick 2006 Retrospective study of patients records: debridement of a range of wounds, including pressure ulcers, trauma wounds and surgical wound complications
Guest 2005 Not RCT: models used to estimate the cost of 2 dressings
Kuleshov 1992 Not RCT: chronic wounds
Moore 2000 Included abscesses; did not measure debridement
Moore 2001 Systematic review
Moues 2004 Wounds treated prior to surgical closure
Mulder 1995 Non‐randomised study; debridement of chronic wounds
Rand 1998 Compared methods of wound closure for dehiscence, rather than debridement methods
Soul 1978 Not RCT: study included a range of wounds including pressure ulcers
Tolstykh 1987 Not RCT: no randomisation method identified
Williams 1995 Abscess wounds
Zeitani 2004 Not RCT: controlled study

RCT = randomised controlled trial