Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;2020(7):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub2

IRCT20200413047056N1.

Study name Comparison between the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin and convalescent plasma in improving the condition of patients with COVID‐19: a randomized clinical trial
Methods
  • Trial design: randomised, clinical trial 

  • Sample size: 15

  • Setting: hospitalised patients 

  • Country: Iran

  • Language: English

  • Number of centres: 1 

Participants
  • Inclusion criteria

    • 18‐50 years old

    • RT‐PCR

    • Confirm the infection in the throat swab or sputum or lower respiratory tract samples

    • Signed informed consent form on a voluntary basis

    • Meet any of the following criteria for severe or critical ill conditions:

      • respiratory rate ≥ 30/min; or

      • rest SpO2 ≤ 90%; or

      • PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg; or

      • respiratory failure and needs mechanical ventilation; or

      • multiple organ failure and needs ICU monitoring

  • Exclusion criteria

    • NR

Interventions
  • CP therapy or hyperimmune immunoglobulin therapy: CP 

  • Details of CP:

    • type of plasma: NR

    • volume: 200 cc each time

    • number of doses: 2

    • antibody‐titre: NR

    • pathogen inactivated or not: NR

  • Treatment details, including time of plasma therapy (e.g. early stage of disease): NR

  • For studies including a control group: comparator (type): 3 arms: CP; IV immunoglobulin (400 mg/kg/d); this group will receive common national protocol

  • Concomitant therapy: common national protocol

  • Treatment cross‐overs: NR

Outcomes
  • Primary study outcome: lung involvement in X‐ray and CT‐scan, SpO2, LDH enzyme, viral load, acute phase protein, white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation

  • Primary review outcomes

    • All‐cause mortality at hospital discharge: NR

    • Time to death:  NR

  • Secondary review outcomes

    • Number of participants with grade 3 and grade 4 AEs, including potential relationship between intervention and adverse reaction (e.g. TRALI, transfusion‐transmitted infection, TACO, TAD, acute transfusion reactions): NR

    • Number of participants with SAEs: NR

    • Improvement of clinical symptoms, assessed through need for respiratory support at up to 7 days; 8‐15 days; 16‐30 days: yes

    • 30‐day and 90‐day mortality: NR

    • Admission on the ICU: NR

    • Length of stay on the ICU: NR

    • Time to discharge from hospital: yes

    • QoL: NR

  • Additional outcomes

    • Lung involvement in X‐ray and CT‐scan

    • SpO2

    • LDH enzyme

    • Viral load

    • Acute phase protein

    • White blood cell count

    • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

Starting date 18 April 2020
Contact information Malihe Zangoue, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjadn, Iran; mzangoue@yahoo.com
Notes
  • Recruitment status: recruiting

  • Prospective completion date: 15 August 2020

  • Sponsor/funding: Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran