Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;2020(7):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub2
'Risk of bias' assessment of Duan 2020
Domain Assessed outcomes Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Bias due to confounding Mortality
Clinical improvement
Serious Quote: "Historic control group was formed by random selection of 10 patients from the cohort treated in the same hospitals and matched by age, gender, and severity of the diseases to the 10 cases in our trial."
Not adjusted for co‐morbidities, previous treatments, time of disease onset, etc. 
Adverse events  Not applicable Paper only reports transfusion‐related adverse events for intervention group
Bias in selection of participants into the study Mortality
Clinical improvement
Critical Small sample size, unclear how participants were selected into intervention group, unclear how long participants of historical control group were followed
Adverse events Not applicable Paper only reports transfusion‐related adverse events for intervention group
 
Bias in classification of interventions Mortality
Clinical improvement
Critical Assignment to control group was done retrospectively. Treatment details of control group are not provided, and it is unclear whether patients were treated during the same period or at a time when less was known about the disease and the treatment options. Knowledge of patients' outcomes at the time of assignment to the control group could have had a major impact on the selection. 
Adverse events  Not applicable Paper only reports transfusion‐related adverse events for intervention group
Bias due to deviations from intended interventions Mortality
Clinical improvement
Adverse events
Low
 
  All participants received the intended intervention.
Bias due to missing data Mortality Serious Mortality is reported for participants in intervention group until day 3 of follow‐up. Unclear how long control group was followed and how clinical status was assessed
Clinical improvement Critical Unclear how long control group was followed and clinical status in terms of respiratory support was not assessed
Adverse events Critical No safety data for control group reported
Bias in measurement of outcomes Mortality Critical Unclear whether follow‐up was comparable between groups
Clinical improvement Critical Clinical course is reported for participants in intervention group until day 3 of follow‐up
Adverse events Critical Only transfusion‐related adverse events reported
Bias in selection of the reported results Mortality
Clinical improvement 
Critical Study was registered as single‐arm trial and control group was retrospectively selected
Adverse events Critical Observation period unclear; only transfusion‐related adverse events assessed and reported
Overall bias Mortality Critical The study is too problematic to provide any useful evidence, however better evidence is yet insufficient.
Clinical improvement Critical The study is too problematic to provide any useful evidence, however better evidence is yet insufficient.
Adverse events Critical The study is too problematic to provide any useful evidence, however better evidence is yet insufficient.