Summary of findings 7. Surgical drain versus no drain after the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
Drain versus no drain after the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth | |||||
Population: adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal
Setting: oral surgery
Intervention: drain (tube drain or gauze drain) Comparison: no drain | |||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | Number of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | ||||
No drain | Drain | ||||
Alveolar osteitis (up to 1‐week follow‐up) |
Not reported | ||||
Wound infection (up to 1‐week follow‐up) |
Not reported | ||||
Permanent altered tongue, chin, or lip sensation (more than 6 months) |
Not reported | ||||
Adverse effects ‐ reactionary bleeding (up to 30 days) |
Not reported | ||||
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |