2. Unuseable published data related to swelling at 7 days.
Studies | Comparison | Subgroup | Reasons |
Şimşek Kaya 2019 | Flap design | Modified triangular flap vs envelope | Presented as % of change from baseline. Data could not be used. Authors were contacted to obtain raw data but no reply received. |
Mobilio 2017 | Flap design | Envelope flap vs triangular flap | To assess swelling, the average percentage value was obtained from 5 distances (in mm) through 6 facial points (angle of the mandible to tragus, to eye outer canthus, to labial commissure, to nasal border, and to soft pogonion). |
Arakji 2016 | Bone removal techniques | Conventional techniques vs piezoelectric surgery | Swelling data were presented by taking the mean of the distance of more than 1 measurement, and the raw data were not provided. |
Basheer 2017 | Bone removal techniques | Piezoelectric vs rotary osteotomy technique | Mean of different measurements |
Bhati 2017 | Bone removal techniques | Piezoelectric vs rotary osteotomy technique | Mean of multiple measurements |
Mantovani 2014 | Bone removal techniques | Piezoelectric surgery vs conventional | Overall swelling or oedema (E) was calculated and expressed as E = [Σdi2/4]0.5, where Σdi is the sum of the 4 facial reference measurements (G‐T, G‐C, G‐S, G‐P). |
Mistry 2016 | Bone removal techniques | Piezoelectric vs rotary osteotomy technique | Distance between extraoral and intraoral reference points was measured with divider to assess the swelling. |
Piersanti 2014 | Bone removal techniques | Conventional techniques vs piezoelectric surgery | Swelling data were presented by taking the mean of the distance of more than 1 measurement, and the raw data were not provided. |
Acar 2017 | Suturing techniques | Horizontal mattress suturing vs simple interrupted suturing | Postoperative swelling was evaluated by measuring the changes of the 5 distances on the face of the participants preoperatively and postoperatively. |
Gogulanathan 2015 | Suturing techniques | Fibrin sealant vs conventional suturing | Swelling raw data were not provided. |
Kumar 2016 | Surgical drain | Tube drain vs none | Means of horizontal and vertical measurements |
Pachipulusu 2018 | Primary vs secondary wound closure | Primary vs secondary closure of the surgical wound | Swelling data presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐op and post‐op measurements. |
Kumar 2015 | Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates | PRF vs none | Swelling data were presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐ and postoperative measurement. |
Uyanik 2015 | Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates | PRF or a combination of PRF and piezoelectric surgery vs conventional rotatory osteotomy | Swelling data presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐op and post‐op measurements. |
Dutta 2016 | Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates | PRF vs none vs PRF+ hydroxyapatite | Mean of 3 measurements |
Kapse 2019 | Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates | PRF vs none | Swelling data presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐op and post‐op measurements. |
PRF: platelet rich fibrin; vs: versus.