Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;2020(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub3

2. Unuseable published data related to swelling at 7 days.

Studies Comparison Subgroup Reasons
Şimşek Kaya 2019 Flap design Modified triangular flap vs envelope Presented as % of change from baseline. Data could not be used. Authors were contacted to obtain raw data but no reply received.
Mobilio 2017 Flap design Envelope flap vs triangular flap To assess swelling, the average percentage value was obtained from 5 distances (in mm) through 6 facial points (angle of the mandible to tragus, to eye outer canthus, to labial commissure, to nasal border, and to soft pogonion).
Arakji 2016 Bone removal techniques Conventional techniques vs piezoelectric surgery Swelling data were presented by taking the mean of the distance of more than 1 measurement, and the raw data were not provided.
Basheer 2017 Bone removal techniques Piezoelectric vs rotary osteotomy technique Mean of different measurements
Bhati 2017 Bone removal techniques Piezoelectric vs rotary osteotomy technique Mean of multiple measurements
Mantovani 2014 Bone removal techniques Piezoelectric surgery vs conventional Overall swelling or oedema (E) was calculated and expressed as E = [Σdi2/4]0.5, where Σdi is the sum of the 4 facial reference measurements (G‐T, G‐C, G‐S, G‐P).
Mistry 2016 Bone removal techniques Piezoelectric vs rotary osteotomy technique Distance between extraoral and intraoral reference points was measured with divider to assess the swelling.
Piersanti 2014 Bone removal techniques Conventional techniques vs piezoelectric surgery Swelling data were presented by taking the mean of the distance of more than 1 measurement, and the raw data were not provided.
Acar 2017 Suturing techniques Horizontal mattress suturing vs simple interrupted suturing Postoperative swelling was evaluated by measuring the changes of the 5 distances on the face of the participants preoperatively and postoperatively.
Gogulanathan 2015 Suturing techniques Fibrin sealant vs conventional suturing Swelling raw data were not provided.
Kumar 2016 Surgical drain Tube drain vs none Means of horizontal and vertical measurements
Pachipulusu 2018 Primary vs secondary wound closure Primary vs secondary closure of the surgical wound Swelling data presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐op and post‐op measurements.
Kumar 2015 Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates PRF vs none Swelling data were presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐ and postoperative measurement.
Uyanik 2015 Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates PRF or a combination of PRF and piezoelectric surgery vs conventional rotatory osteotomy Swelling data presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐op and post‐op measurements.
Dutta 2016 Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates PRF vs none vs PRF+ hydroxyapatite Mean of 3 measurements
Kapse 2019 Wound closure with autologous platelet concentrates PRF vs none Swelling data presented as a percentage of the differences between pre‐op and post‐op measurements.

PRF: platelet rich fibrin; vs: versus.