Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;2020(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub3

Comparison 2. Lingual nerve protection versus no protection.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
2.1 Permanent altered sensation (up to 6 months) 1   Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1.1 Lingual flap and reflection versus no lingual flap 1 380 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.14 [0.00, 6.82]
2.2 Temporary altered sensation (up to 1 month) 3 735 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.18 [1.75, 9.98]
2.2.1 Subperiosteal lingual nerve protection versus none 1 300 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.39 [0.35, 32.97]
2.2.2 Free's retractor lingual nerve protection versus none 1 55 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 12.09 [1.03, 142.26]
2.2.3 Lingual flap and reflection versus no lingual flap 1 380 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.64 [1.31, 10.08]