Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;2020(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub3

Comparison 4. Wound irrigation techniques (A versus B).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
4.1 Alveolar osteitis (7 days) 2   Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1.1 Mechanical versus manual surgical wound irrigation 1 99 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 8.09]
4.1.2 High‐volume versus low‐volume wound irrigation 1 211 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.52 [0.27, 1.02]
4.2 Wound infection (7 days) 2   Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.2.1 Mechanical versus manual surgical wound irrigation 1 99 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.50 [0.05, 5.43]
4.2.2 High‐volume versus low‐volume wound irrigation 1 211 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.02, 1.37]