Kapse 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: split‐mouth RCT Conducted in: India |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: patients with normal haematologic profiles, no systemic illness, good oral hygiene, and surgical site free of active infection Exclusion criteria: use of tobacco or alcohol during the study period and unwillingness to attend the long‐term follow‐up programme Age: 18 to 40 years Number randomised: 30 participants/60 sites Number evaluated: 30 participants/60 sites |
|
Interventions | Platelet‐rich fibrin in extraction socket versus none Group A: test group (n = 30 site) PRF placed in the extraction socket Group B: control (n = 30 site) The time interval between extractions of M3 in a participant was 30 days. All procedures were performed under local anaesthesia, braided, black silk suture was used. |
|
Outcomes | Pain (0‐to‐10 VAS), swelling, and bone healing (radiographical assessment) | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Comment: participants were randomly assigned numbers and were categorised into groups |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: method of concealment of the allocations was not clearly stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) patient | Unclear risk | Comment: it is not explicitly stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) assessor | Low risk | Comment: all of the evaluations were carried out by investigators other than the operating surgeon |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: no dropouts |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All planned outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified. |