3. Induction setting (start and waiting).
STUDY | START (hospital or home: and type of unit (obstetric or midwife‐led)) | WAITING (hospital or home) |
Augensen 1987 | Hospital "Women in group 1 (immediate induction) were then referred to the delivery department for induction" |
Not reported |
Baev 2017 | Hospital | Not reported |
Bergsjo 1989 | Hospital | Hospital (not explicitly stated that women in the induction group stayed in hospital after induction started). However authors reported that two women in the induction group (who waited up until a week for induction) stayed in hospital after randomisation, due to transport/distance issues). This suggests that some women waited at home. |
Brane 2014 | Hospital (Swedish delivery unit) | Hospital |
Breart 1982 | Unclear (in French) | Unclear (in French) |
Chakravarti 2000 | Not reported | Not reported |
Chanrachkul 2003 | Hospital | Hospital |
Cohn 1992 | Not reported | Not reported |
Cole 1975 | Hospital | Not reported |
Dyson 1987 | Hospital | Home and hospital: women who did not have a regular contractile pattern 45 minutes after induction gel was administered were allowed to go home; those who did were admitted to the hospital. |
Egarter 1989 | Not reported | Not reported |
Gelisen 2005 | Hospital | Hospital |
Grobman 2018 | Not reported (A specific induction protocol was not mandated for women who underwent induction in either group). |
Not reported |
Hannah 1992 | Hospital (community and tertiary) | Not reported, only reported that when induction was started, women were treated as outpatients in the hospital |
Heimstad 2007 | Hospital | Not reported |
Henry 1969 | Hospital | Not reported |
Herabutya 1992 | Hospital | Home and hospital or either: women with a Bishop score > 6 stayed in hospital after the induction was performed, and sent to birthing ward; while those with a lower Bishop score were asked to go home and come in the next morning |
James 2001 | Hospital | Not reported |
Keulen 2019 | Primary care midwifery practices (n = 123) and hospitals (n = 45) (in the Netherlands, care is provided for women with normal risk pregnancies by midwives, and for pregnancies at increased risk by obstetricians or gynaecologists) | "all women in the 41 week induction group received obstetrician led intrapartum secondary care" |
Martin 1978 | Hospital | Hospital |
Martin 1989 | Hospital | Hospital |
Miller 2015 | Hospital | Hospital |
NICHHD 1994 | Hospital | Hospital |
Nielsen 2005 | Hospital | Not reported |
Ocon 1997 | Unclear (in Spanish) | Unclear (in Spanish) |
Roach 1997 | Hospital | Not reported |
Sahraoui 2005 | Not reported | Not reported |
Sande 1983 | Not reported | Not reported |
Sargunam 2019 | Hospital Not stated by authors, however implied by the trial inclusion criteria: "persistent contractions after overnight hospitalisation > 8 h" |
Not reported |
Suikkari 1983 | Hospital | Not reported |
Tylleskar 1979 | "Two health clinics" | Health clinic where labour was induced |
Walker 2016 | Not reported: "In the induction group, local policies for induction of labor were followed". | Not reported |
Wennerholm 2019 | Not reported | Not reported |
Witter 1987 | Hospital | Not reported |