Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Alcalay 1996 | PROM at term |
Amano 1999 | Alternate allocation trial |
Ascher‐Walsh 2000 | Compared 2 forms of IOL |
Bell 1993 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Berghella 1996 | Membrane stripping to decrease the need for formal IOL |
Boulvain 1998 | Membrane stripping to decrease the need for formal IOL |
Buttino 1990 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Cardozo 1986 | Alternate allocation trial |
Conway 2000 | Trial of active versus expectant management in women with oligohydramnios |
CTRI/2018/09/015719 | High‐risk pregnancy (women with previous caesarean) included in this trial |
Damania 1992 | Trial of cervical ripening (2 methods) not IOL |
Dare 2002 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
De Aquino 2003 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Doany 1997 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Dunn 1989 | Intervention not a policy to induce labour compared with expectant management |
El‐Torkey 1992 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Elliott 1984 | Trial of nipple stimulation as a method of cervical ripening. No commitment to delivery within a given time or protocol |
Evans 1983 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Frass 2011 | Trial where all women were judged to be at risk (severe pre‐eclampsia) |
Garry 2000 | Alternate allocation trial |
Giacalone 1998 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Gregson 2015 | Assessing effectiveness of acupuncture for IOL (role of acupuncture not established) |
Hage 1993 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Heden 1991 | Alternate allocation trial |
Hernandez‐Castro 2008 | Not a RCT |
Imsuwan 1999 | This is a RCT evaluating the effectiveness of weekly membrane sweeping in labour initiation for women at 41 completed weeks. It is not evaluating a policy of stopping the pregnancy at 41 weeks |
Ingemarsson 1987 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Iqbal 2004 | Alternate allocation trial |
Jenssen 1977 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Kadar 1990 | Trial of nipple stimulation as a method of cervical ripening. No commitment to delivery within a given time or protocol |
Katz 1983 | Alternate allocation trial |
Kipikasa 2005 | Comparing alternate methods for IOL |
Klopper 1969 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Knox 1979 | Quasi‐randomised (last digit of hospital number) |
Lee 1997 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Lemancewicz 1999 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Lien 1998 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Lyons 2001 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Magann 1998 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Magann 1999 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Mancuso 1998 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Meydanli 2003 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Misra 1994 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Müller 1995 | Compares 2 forms of IOL |
Neri 2014 | Assessing effectiveness of acupressure for IOL (role of acupuressure not established) |
Newman 1997 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Nicholson 2008 | Trial where all women were judged to be at risk |
Ohel 1996 | Alternate allocation |
PACTR201805002872322 | Not low risk pregnancies |
Papageorgiou 1992 | Compared 2 forms of IOL |
Paul 1988 | Protocol for RCT only ‐ no results |
Rayburn 1988 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Rayburn 1999 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Rijnders 2011 | Compared 2 alternative management strategies for IOL |
Roberts 1986 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Satin 1991 | Compared 2 forms of IOL |
Sawai 1991 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Sawai 1994 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Stenlund 1999 | Mifepristone versus placebo for IOL, but all women given PGE2 if necessary after 48 hours |
Su 1996 | Both groups induced within 2 days with alternative methods |
Surbek 1997 | Compared 2 forms of IOL |
Suzuki 1999 | Immediate IOL versus expectant management in twin pregnancies |
Williams 1990 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Wing 2000 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Wong 2002 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
Ziaei 2003 | Trial of cervical ripening not IOL |
IOL: induction of labour PGE2: prostaglandin E2 PROM: premature rupture of membranes RCT: randomised controlled trial