Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD006712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006712.pub2

Phair 2002.

Methods Prospective, randomized, non‐blinded (cannot blind waiting versus non waiting) trial. Per power calculations sample size of 196 needed to detect 1cm difference in pain. 
 Columbia Willamette Planned Parenthood, Portland, Oregon, USA. Study length: May 2000 to June 2001
Participants 199 pregnant women. Age 18 yrs or older. Gestational age <11wks. Good general health. English language comprehension. 
 Exclusion criteria: major psychiatric symptoms as well as PID, intravenous sedation or misoprostol.
Interventions Group 1: 3‐5 minute wait between injection and dilation of the cervix 
 Group 2: no wait. 
 All participants: paracervical block (PCB) with total of 12ml 1% buffered lidocaine at 12 (superficially), 4 and 8 o'clock (1‐2cm deep). Diazepam 5mg po and /or fentanyl 100mcg IV as additional pain medication per patient request. 
 Vacuum aspiration.
Outcomes Self reported pain and measured with a 10cm visual analog scale with dilation, aspiration and post procedure as well as anticipated pain. Satisfaaction at the end of the procedure (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, netrual, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied).
Notes Per e‐mail communication: randomization with computer generated random numbers in blocks of 50. Allocation concealment with sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. 
 194 women completed the study and were analysed. 2 excluded for administration of extra sedative medications and 2 lost to follow‐up. One woman chose to discontinue. No major complications reported. Subanalysis per fentanyl use.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate