Study	Intervention	Outcome	Int pre (%)1	C pre (%)2	Int post n/N (%)3	C post n/N (%)3	Relative % change (post)	Int vs C absolute change from pre (%)	ARD5	Absolute % change (post)	P value6
Curtis 2007	A&F + ed mat	BMD test	‐	‐	90/472 (19.1)	100/477 (21.0)	‐	‐	‐	‐1.9	0.48
Feldstein 2006	Ed mat + rem	BMD test	‐	‐	40/101 (39.6)	5/101 (5.0)	‐	‐	‐	34.6	<0.01
	Ed mat + pt med + rem	BMD test	‐	‐	36/110 (32.7)	5/101 (5.0)	‐	‐	‐	27.7	<0.01
Gardner 2005	Pt med	BMD test	‐	‐	12/40 (30.0)	6/40 (15.0)	‐	‐	‐	15.0	NR7
Lafata 2007	Pt med	BMD test	‐	‐	720/3367 (21.4)	313/2901 (10.8)	‐	‐	‐	10.6	<0.001
	Pt med + rem	BMD test	‐	‐	1181/4086 (28.9)	313/2901 (10.8)	‐	‐	‐	18.1	<0.001
Majumdar 2004	Ed mat + pt med + rem	BMD test	‐	‐	34/55 (61.8)	8/47 (17.0)	‐	‐	‐	44.8	<0.001
Majumdar 2007	Organisational + pt med	BMD test	‐	‐	88/110 (80.0)	32/110 (29.0)	‐	‐	‐	51.0	<0.001
Prihar 2008	Ed mat + pt med	BMD test	(6.3)	(4.6)	174/918 (19.0)	57/595 (9.6)	97.9	12.7 vs 5.0	7.7	9.4	UAE
Solomon 2004	A&F + ed mat + ed meet	BMD test	(9.0)	(5.2)	13/168 (7.8) 8	16/205 (7.8) 8	0.0	‐1.2 vs 2.6	‐3.8	0.0	0.9
Solomon 2007	Ed mat + EO	BMD test	‐	‐	183/3574  (5.1)	224/3268 (6.9)	‐	‐	‐	‐1.8	NS
	Pt med	BMD test	‐	‐	249/3274 (7.6)	224/3268 (6.9)	‐	‐	‐	0.7	NS
	Ed mat + EO + pt med	BMD test	‐	‐	223/3339 (6.7)	224/3268 (6.9)	‐	‐	‐	‐0.2	NS
Solomon 2007a	Ed mat + EO + pt med + rem	BMD test	‐	‐	126/997 (12.6)	86/976 (8.8)	‐	‐	‐	3.8	0.01