Feldstein 2006.

Methods	Type of targeted behaviour: increase in test ordering (BMD test) + prescribing Study design: RCT Country: USA
Participants	Setting: primary care 15 practices, 159 providers, 327 patients Condition: women aged 50 to 89 who had suffered a fracture (any type) and therefore high likelihood of osteoporosis
Interventions	1. Professional intervention (reminders: electronic medical record message about patient’s risk of osteoporosis + distribution of education materials) 2. Professional intervention (reminders + distribution of education materials) + patient mediated (education materials) 3. Standard practice control group
Outcomes	Professional practice: proportion of study population who received medication for osteoporosis or a BMD test within 6 months after the intervention Patient level: regular physical activity; total caloric expenditure; total calcium intake; patient satisfaction
Notes	Justification for intervention type: previous studies showing electronic medical records effective in other clinical conditions Intervention fidelity: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation?	Low risk	From report: “A computer random‐number generator seeded by date and time once at the start of the study generated the random sequence”
Allocation concealment?	Unclear risk	From report: “The study statistician randomized and assigned participants to the study groups”, but not specified if study statistician involved in recruitment process
Blinding? All outcomes	Low risk	From report: “The study analyst assessing the outcomes was blinded to the treatment groups”
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes	Low risk
Free of selective reporting?	Unclear risk	Insufficient information provided
Free of other bias?	High risk	No protection against contamination.