Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006094. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006094.pub2

Gardner 2005.

Methods Type of targeted behaviour: increase in test ordering (BMD test) + prescribing
Study design: RCT
Country: USA
Participants Setting: intervention provided to patients in hospital, imaging outcome measured against primary care provider
80 patients
Condition: hip fracture in elderly (>65 age) and high likelihood of osteoporosis
Interventions 1. Patient mediated (education materials + 15 minute talk) + list of questions to take to primary care physician
2. Control: unrelated patient education
Outcomes Professional practice: proportion of patients who had BMD test performed within 6 months; bisphosphonate therapy prescribed
Patient level: none
Notes Justification for intervention type: not reported
Intervention fidelity: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk From report: “The patients were randomly enrolled into two groups by means of sealed envelopes, which were divided equally into ‘control group’ and ‘study group’ designations”
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Reported that envelopes were used but not reported if they were opaque and sequentially numbered
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk 4 from control (died); 4 from intervention (died) and 2 more lost to follow‐up considered to not have had BMD testing
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Insufficient information provided
Free of other bias? High risk No protection against contamination; patient directed intervention and outcomes self‐reported by patient.