Majumdar 2007.

Methods	Type of targeted behaviour: increase in test ordering (BMD test) + prescribing Study design: RCT Country: Canada
Participants	Setting: hospital (inpatient) 220 patients Condition: people 50 years and older with hip fracture undergoing surgical fixation (high likelihood of osteoporosis)
Interventions	1. Organisational intervention (case management: case manager, profession not reported + scheduling BMD test) + patient education (provided in hospital about BMD testing and medication) 2. Standard practice control group
Outcomes	Professional practice: proportion of patients who had BMD testing within 6 months; bisphosphonate therapy Patient level: recurrent fractures; admission to hospital; death Cost: intervention cost per patient
Notes	Justification for intervention type: literature reviews and qualitative in‐depth interviews with health professionals Intervention fidelity: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation?	Unclear risk	From report: “Patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria and provided informed consent were randomized (allocation‐concealed) to either the case manager intervention or usual care.”
Allocation concealment?	Low risk
Blinding? All outcomes	Low risk	From report: “investigators and analysts... were masked to allocation status at all times.”
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes	Low risk
Free of selective reporting?	Unclear risk	Insufficient information provided
Free of other bias?	Low risk