Majumdar 2008.

Methods	Type of targeted behaviour: general management of a problem Study design: RCT Country: Canada
Participants	Setting: primary care 266 providers, 272 patients Condition: 50 years or older and distal forearm fracture (high likelihood of osteoporosis)
Interventions	1. Professional intervention (distribution of educational materials + reminder) + patient mediated (education and counselling via telephone) 2. Patient mediated (distribution of educational materials)
Outcomes	Professional practice: proportion of patients who had received BMD test; prescription of osteoporosis medication; composite measure of quality of guideline‐concordant or “appropriate” care Patient level: health status (SF‐12); osteoporosis‐related quality of life; wrist‐related functional outcomes; osteoporosis‐related knowledge; satisfaction with care Cost: intervention cost per patient
Notes	Justification for intervention type: not reported Intervention fidelity: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation?	Low risk
Allocation concealment?	Low risk	From report: “Allocation was concealed by application of variable block sizes and by use of a secure, centralized, Internet‐based, computer‐generated randomization system”
Blinding? All outcomes	Low risk	From report: “Research nurses collected outcomes data without knowledge of allocation status”
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes	Low risk	All included patients accounted for
Free of selective reporting?	Low risk	All outcomes listed in Methods were reported. Comment: Probably done.
Free of other bias?	Low risk