Rozental 2008.

Methods	Type of targeted behaviour: general management of a problem Study design: RCT Country: USA
Participants	Setting: primary care Number of providers not reported, 50 patients Condition: patients with fragility fracture of distal radius and probable osteoporosis
Interventions	1. Case management (treating orthopaedic surgeon ordered BMD test then forwarded results to primary care physician) 2. Professional intervention (distribution of educational materials: treating orthopaedic surgeon sent guideline to primary care physician)
Outcomes	Professional practice: proportion of patients who received BMD test within 6 months; osteoporosis treatment discussed; osteoporosis treatment administered Patient level: none
Notes	Justification for intervention type: not reported Intervention fidelity: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation?	Unclear risk	From report: “Patients were randomized to one of two interventions” was only information reported
Allocation concealment?	Unclear risk	Not reported
Blinding? All outcomes	Unclear risk	Not reported
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes	Low risk	No missing data
Free of selective reporting?	Unclear risk	Insufficient information provided
Free of other bias?	High risk	No protection against contamination. Patients randomised but intervention directed at providers, therefore providers could have patients in both intervention groups